No abstract

In mammals, the perception of pain is initiated by the transduction of noxious stimuli through specialized ion channels and receptors expressed by nociceptive sensory neurons. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the specification of distinct sensory modality are, however, largely unknown. We show here that Runx1, a Runt domain transcription factor, is expressed in most nociceptors during embryonic development but in adult mice, becomes restricted to nociceptors marked by expression of the neurotrophin receptor Ret. In these neurons, Runx1 regulates the expression of many ion channels and receptors, including TRP class thermal receptors, Na+-gated, ATP-gated, and H+-gated channels, the opioid receptor MOR, and Mrgpr class G protein coupled receptors. Runx1 also controls the lamina-specific innervation pattern of nociceptive afferents in the spinal cord. Moreover, mice lacking Runx1 exhibit specific defects in thermal and neuropathic pain. Thus, Runx1 coordinates the phenotype of a large cohort of nociceptors, a finding with implications for pain therapy.

Neural progenitor cells often produce distinct types of neurons in a specific order, but the determinants that control the sequential generation of distinct neuronal subclasses in the vertebrate CNS remain poorly defined. We examined the sequential generation of visceral motor neurons and serotonergic neurons from a common pool of neural progenitors located in the ventral hindbrain. We found that the temporal specification of these neurons varies along the anterior-posterior axis of the hindbrain, and that the timing of their generation critically depends on the integrated activities of Nkx-and Hox-class homeodomain proteins. A primary function of these proteins is to coordinate the spatial and temporal activation of the homeodomain protein Phox2b, which in turn acts as a binary switch in the selection of motor neuron or serotonergic neuronal fate. These findings assign new roles for Nkx, Hox, and Phox2 proteins in the control of temporal neuronal fate determination, and link spatial and temporal patterning of CNS neuronal fates. Neuronal cell diversity is established by mechanisms that operate in space and over time during central nervous system (CNS) development. Insight has been obtained regarding the initial steps of spatial patterning of neurons along the dorsal-ventral (DV) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes of the neural tube Jessell 2000). Local inductive signals determine the spatial pattern of expression of transcription factors along both these axes, so that neural progenitors at different positions acquire distinct molecular identities. In the ventral neural tube, neuronal fate along the DV axis depends on the Shh-mediated patterning of Nkx-, Dbx-, Pax-, and Irx-class homeodomain (HD) proteins . Along the AP axis, the overlapping, or nested, expression pattern of Hox HD proteins provides positional values that influence the fate of neurons . Despite significant advances, however, DV and AP patterning have generally been analyzed independently, leaving open the issue as to what degree these orthogonal patterning mechanisms are integrated (Davenne et al. 1999;Gaufo et al. 2000). Compared to spatial patterning, little is known about the mechanisms that underlie how neural progenitors produce distinct types of neurons in a specific temporal order. Studies of the retina (Livesey and Cepko 2001) and developing neo-cortex (Monuki and Walsh 2001) suggest that the sequential production of different neuronal subtypes reflects temporal changes in neural progenitors, either in response to extrinsic cues or mechanisms intrinsic to neural progenitor cells. Recent data indicate that modulation of Notch signaling by the bHLH protein Mash1 and the HD proteins Dlx1/2 may control the sequential specification of progenitors in subcortical areas of the telencephalon (Yun et al. 2002). Apart from this, few molecular determinants that influence these temporal processes in the vertebrate CNS have been identified to date. ResultsTo address how spatial and temporal aspects of cell patterning are integrated during development, w...

Most neurons in vertebrates make a developmental choice between two principal neurotransmitter phenotypes (glutamatergic versus GABAergic). Here we show that the homeobox gene Lbx1 determines a GABAergic cell fate in the dorsal spinal cord at early embryonic stages. In Lbx1-/- mice, the presumptive GABAergic neurons are transformed into glutamatergic cells. Furthermore, overexpression of Lbx1 in the chick spinal cord is sufficient to induce GABAergic differentiation. Paradoxically, Lbx1 is also expressed in glutamatergic neurons. We previously reported that the homeobox genes Tlx1 and Tlx3 determine glutamatergic cell fate. Here we show that impaired glutamatergic differentiation, observed in Tlx3-/- mice, is restored in Tlx3-/-Lbx1-/- mice. These genetic studies suggest that Lbx1 expression defines a basal GABAergic differentiation state, and Tlx3 acts to antagonize Lbx1 to promote glutamatergic differentiation.