The rocking pile foundation system is a relatively new design concept that can be implemented in bridges to improve their seismic performance. This type of foundation prevents plastic damage at the bridge piers and the foundation system, which are difficult to repair and can lead to collapse. However, lack of adequate energy dissipation in this type of foundation can result in large deck displacements and subsequent catastrophic failures of the bridge. The present study proposes a novel foundation system that integrates post-tensioned piles with the rocking foundation to simultaneously prevent plastic hinging at the piers and reduce the deck displacements during severe earthquakes. The effectiveness of the proposed foundation system is investigated and compared against the rocking pile and conventional fixed-base foundation systems using identical bridge configurations. Three-dimensional finite element models of these bridges were developed to capture possible nonlinear behavior of the bridge as well as soil-structure interaction effects. Six strong earthquakes with both horizontal components were selected and scaled to the appropriate seismic hazard level with a return period of 2475 years. Static pushover and nonlinear time-history analyses were then performed to compare the dynamic response of the bridges, including deck displacements, pier and pile inertial forces, and other nonlinear behavior experienced by the structure. The results reveal that by integrating the post-tensioned piles with the rocking foundation, the deck displacements were reduced to an acceptable limit without subjecting the bridge to any damage. In contrast, the bridge with the fixed base foundation experienced extensive damage at the piers, and the bridge with the rocking foundation experienced substantial deck displacements that ultimately led to unseating, resulting in the collapse of both bridges. It was therefore concluded that the proposed rocking foundation system with post-tensioned piles is the superior alternative and can be implemented in practice as an attractive solution due to the seismic protection it offers.

No abstract

Rocking foundations are proven to be an effective base isolation technique that improves the seismic performance of bridges and minimises the damage at the piers during large earthquakes. However, due to the foundations ability to uplift, the subsequent reduction of the pier's stiffness leads to larger column drifts and deck displacements. This not only attracts larger stresses to the transverse direction of the deck, but also at the abutment which, if not carefully considered, can lead to severe damages. Therefore, this study will investigate the seismic response of bridges with rocking pile foundations subjected to transverse earthquake excitations and compare it to the response of conventional fixed base bridges. Two separate shear key performance levels are investigated for each bridge: (1) non-linear shear keys that break off; and (2) shear keys that remain rigid. 3D numerical models of the bridges are developed using finite element software with consideration of soil-structure interaction. Moreover, non-linear time history analyses are performed on the bridges using four ground-motion records, where their dynamic response are then compared. Results show that the conventional bridges collapsed due to the development of plastic hinging at the piers. However, the bridges with the rocking pile foundations experienced significant deck displacements which caused flexural plastic hinging of the deck and the subsequent collapse of the bridge. Moreover, when the shear keys failed, the deck experienced large displacements at the abutment which caused the bearing to rupture and displace permanently with the risk of unseating and span failure. Bridges with this foundation system will require additional design provisions to prevent such failures from occurring.