Purpose/Background: Olecranon fractures are common, particularly in the elderly osteoporotic population. Although various techniques of fixation are available, the gold standard—tension band wiring (TBW)—has high complication and reoperation rates. We sought to identify current evidence for the use of high-strength suture tension banding methods to determine whether they reduce complications and reoperation rates while maintaining fixation. Methods: A systematic review of several databases was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases included Cochrane, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase. We searched for evidence of at least Level I to IV (according to NHMRC) of the use of tension band suturing or anchors in the surgical treatment of displaced olecranon fractures. We also analyzed the cost of fixation in our institute. Results: Four hundred and forty articles were identified. Of these, 9 met the inclusion criteria. One hundred thirty-one subjects had an average age of 66 years. All the studies showed that high-strength suture tension banding/anchoring maintained fixation with displaced olecranon fractures, reducing the complication rates and showed minimal reoperation rates. There was also a significant cost advantage of the suture tape construct mainly due to avoiding subsequent removal of metal. Conclusion: Tension band suturing or anchoring displaced olecranon fractures may be an alternative cost effective method to TBW in maintaining fixation, reducing metalware complications and reducing re-operation rates. Level of Evidence: IV.
Background: This systematic review aims to study the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in the reduction of tendon adhesions postsurgical repair.
Method: A systematic review was performed involving four databases, Cochrane,PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase, looking for evidence of at least Level I or Level II (according to NHMRC) in the use of 5FU in tendon repairs in human or animal studies.Results: Across the four databases 546 articles were identified. Of these 12 were identified as relevant, with a further two being excluded after in depth review.
Background
Fractures of the distal radius represent the most common fracture of the upper limb, and can be managed surgically with volar locking plate osteosynthesis (VLPO). Uncertainty remains regarding the optimal length of the distal locking screws. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal VLPO screw length which provided adequate stability while minimizing complications.
Methods
A systematic review of relevant literature published within Cochrane, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase, including studies up to April 2020, was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they investigated distal radius fracture fixation with VLPO, screw lengths, complications, and associated imaging.
Results
Search results identified 664 relevant studies, of which 14 studies examining 926 radii were included for review. Synthesis revealed that unicortical locking fixation with screws ~75% the depth of the radius, or 2 mm short of the dorsal cortex, provided equivalent stability to bicortical fixation. The lunate may be used as a proxy to determine radial depth at each quartile column. Inadvertent screw protrusion can be assessed by taking four images intra‐operatively; anteroposterior (AP), lateral, 45° supinated and dorsal tangential views (DTVs). Radial shaft screws can have up to 2 mm prominence with no clinical significance.
Conclusion
Unicortical locking fixation at least 75% the depth of the distal radius provides equivalent stability to bicortical fixation in extra‐articular fractures with lower complication rates. Imaging should be used to confirm that penetration of the dorsal cortex has not occurred.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.