Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) features hypoplastic anemia and congenital malformations, largely caused by mutations in various ribosomal proteins. The aim of this study was to characterize the spectrum of genetic lesions causing DBA and identify genotypes that correlate with phenotypes of clinical significance. Seventy-four patients with DBA from across Canada were included. Nucleotide-level mutations or large deletions were identified in 10 ribosomal genes in 45 cases. The RPS19 mutation group was associated with higher requirement for chronic treatment for anemia than other DBA groups. Patients with RPS19 mutations, however, were more likely to maintain long-term corticosteroid response without requirement for further chronic transfusions. Conversely, patients with RPL11 mutations were less likely to need chronic treatment. Birth defects, including cardiac, skeletal, hand, cleft lip or palate and genitourinary malformations, also varied among the various genetic groups. Patients with RPS19 mutations had the fewest number of defects, while patients with RPL5 had the greatest number of birth defects. This is the first study to show differences between DBA genetic groups with regards to treatment. Previously unreported differences in the rate and types of birth defects were also identified. These data allow better patient counseling, a more personalized monitoring plan, and may also suggest differential functions of DBA genes on ribosome and extra-ribosomal functions.

IntroductionInterstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD) with substantial variability in prevalence and outcomes reported across CTD subtypes. This systematic review summarises the prevalence, risk factors and ILD patterns on chest computed tomography of CTD-ILD.MethodsA comprehensive search was performed in Medline and Embase to identify eligible studies. Meta-analyses were completed using a random effects model to determine the pooled prevalence of CTD-ILD and ILD patterns.Results11 582 unique citations were identified with 237 articles included. Pooled prevalence of ILD was 11% in rheumatoid arthritis (95% CI 7–15%), 47% in systemic sclerosis (44–50%), 41% in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (33–50%), 17% in primary Sjögren's syndrome (12–21%), 56% in mixed connective tissue disease (39–72%) and 6% in systemic lupus erythematosus (3–10%). Usual interstitial pneumonia was the most prevalent ILD pattern in rheumatoid arthritis (pooled prevalence of 46%), while nonspecific interstitial pneumonia was the most common ILD pattern in all other CTD subtypes (pooled prevalence range 27–76%). Across all CTDs with available data, positive serology and higher inflammatory markers were risk factors for development of ILD.DiscussionWe identified substantial variability in ILD across CTD subtypes suggesting that CTD-ILD is too heterogenous to be considered a single entity.

No abstract

BackgroundThere is growing interest in using high-dose rifamycin (HDR) regimens in TB treatment, but the safety and efficacy of HDR regimens remain uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing HDR to standard-dose rifamycin (SDR) regimens.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and clinicaltrials.gov for prospective studies comparing daily therapy with HDRs to SDRs. Rifamycins included rifampicin, rifapentine and rifabutin. Our primary outcome was the rate of severe adverse events (SAEs), with secondary outcomes of death, all adverse events, SAE by organ and efficacy outcomes of 2-month culture conversion and relapse. This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020142519).ResultsWe identified 9057 articles and included 13 studies with 6168 participants contributing 7930 person-years (PY) of follow-up (HDR: 3535 participants, 4387 PY; SDR: 2633 participants, 3543 PY). We found no significant difference in the pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SAE between HDR and SDR (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.23, I2=41%). There was no significant difference when analysis was limited to SAE possibly, probably or likely medication-related (IRR 1.07, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41, I2=0%); studies with low risk of bias (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.20, I2=44%); or studies using rifampicin (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0. 0.75–1.32, I2=38%). No significant differences were noted in pooled outcomes of death, 2-month culture conversion and relapse.ConclusionsHDRs were not associated with a significant difference in SAEs, 2-month culture conversion or death. Further studies are required to identify specific groups who may benefit from HDR.

Background/Objectives: Diamond Blackfan anemia (DBA) is an inherited disorder characterized by chronic hypoproductive anemia, physical malformations, and an increased risk of malignancies. At least 12 DBA genes have been identified, which include various ribosomal protein genes and the transcription factor GATA1. The aims of our study were (1) to identify the mutation spectrum of DBA patients, utilizing a cohort of patients enrolled on the Canadian Inherited Marrow Failure Registry (CIMFR) and (2) to determine whether specific hematological abnormalities, malformations, and outcomes are associated with specific mutations. Methods: Patients were enrolled on the CIMFR, which is a multicenter cohort study of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS). Genetic testing was performed using one or more of the following tests: Sanger sequencing, next generation sequencing (NGS) DBA gene panel, a comprehensive NGS IBMFS gene panel developed in our laboratory, or comparative genetic hybridization (CGH). Severity of the hematological disease was dichotomized according to a patient's requirement for chronic treatment: those who were maintained on corticosteroids, blood transfusions, or received a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation were considered to have a more severe phenotype than those who did not require hematological treatment. Chi-square tests with a Fisher's exact test correction were used to compare genetic groups with at least 5 patients on observed phenotypes. Results: 71 patients with DBA have been enrolled in our registry. A causal mutation has been identified in 36 of these patients, with the following rates: RPS19 (n=11), RPL11 (n=7), RPL5 (n=6), RPS26 (n=5), RPL35a (n=2), RPS24 (n=2), and one of each RPS7, RPS29, RPS17. Remarkably, a substantial number of patients in our population-based cohort (19.4%) had mild hematological phenotype requiring no therapy. Patients with RPL11 mutations tended to have a less severe DBA phenotype, while patients with RPS19 mutations tended to have a more severe phenotype (p=0.04). In terms of non-hematological malformations, we found no differences in cardiac, stature and craniofacial malformations across the groups compared (all p>0.1). However, patients with RPL5 mutations had significantly more hand malformations (p=0.02), and patients with RPS26 mutations had more genitourinary malformations (p=0.04). To control for the impact of mutation severity on the observed phenotype, we compared the prevalence of mutations that are predicted to result in truncated or lack of protein from the respective allele (large copy-number variation, nonsense, or indel frameshift) to mutations that are predicted to be hypomorphic or affect function (splicing, indel/inframe and, missense) between mutation categories. There were no differences among genetic groups in the severity of their mutations (p=0.58). Conclusions: Mutations in a wide spectrum of ribosomal protein genes underlie DBA cases in Canada, which approximate those observed by other registries in Western countries. Patients with DBA caused by RPL11 mutations tended to have a milder hematological phenotype, while patients with RPS19 mutation tended to have a more severe phenotype. Mutations in RPS26 and RPL5 are associated with genitourinary and hand malformations, respectively. Our findings may help improve counseling of DBA patients and their family. Future studies are needed to replicate our results and determine whether these findings can help personalize care. Disclosures Lipton: Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.