IM is a relatively rare benign tumour, the pre-operative diagnosis of which using radiological and clinical methods is quite difficult, creating pre-operative diagnostic confusion. It is generally diagnosed by microscopic examination. Simple excision with a small margin of surrounding tissue is considered to be sufficient for its treatment.

Free style facial artery and lateral nasal artery perforator flaps were performed in 22 patients (11 males and 11 females) who had removal of facial tumor between March 2015 and December 2016 RESULTS:: The median age of patients was 62 years (range: 35-84). The mean follow-up period was 12.6 months (range: 5-24). Pathology results were basal cell carcinoma in 13 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 6 patients, and other skin tumors in 3 patients. The defect size ranged from 2 × 2 to 5 × 5 cm. No major or minor complication happened but 1 flap had venous congestion that healed without any intervention CONCLUSION:: Free style facial perforator flaps are highly reliable flaps with wide range of motion. In addition, they provide single-stage closure with esthetic subunit reconstruction. With the current knowledge of reconstruction and skills of microsurgery, they can be easily the first choice for the closure of mid-facial defects.

Various local flaps have been defined for small skin defects of the nose. However, the repair of large nasal defects is only possible with flaps allowing a large tissue transfer, such as a free flap, forehead flap, and nasolabial flap. In this study, large nasal defects were reconstructed with extended central artery perforator propeller (CAPP) flaps in an attempt to describe a single-stage procedure as an alternative technique to the median forehead flap. Thirteen large nasal skin defects, including dorsum and nasal sidewall and/or dome, were repaired with a CAPP flap between January 2015 and March 2018. A total of 13 patients aged 19 to 92 years were included. The mean follow-up period was 14.9 months. Pathological diagnoses were basal cell carcinoma in 5 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 6 patients, and trauma in 2 patients. Defect size ranged between 3 × 3 and 4 × 5 cm. Flap size ranged between 3 × 7 and 5 × 10 cm. No major complications including total flap failure, hematoma, or infection were observed. However, a partial flap necrosis occurred in 1 patient. In 3 patients, scar revision surgery was performed at the postoperative period. In conclusion, CAPP flap use is a safe and reliable option to repair large nasal defects. This flap is able to cover large nasal defects including dorsal, dome, and nasal sidewall defects in a single-stage procedure. Requiring no pedicle separation, this flap is an alternative option to the conventional median forehead flap.

No abstract