We examined emergent tact control following stimulus pairing, using 2 different stimulus presentation arrangements. In the word-first condition, presentation of the auditory stimulus preceded the visual stimulus, and in the image-first condition, the visual stimulus preceded the auditory stimulus. Eight children (2-5 years old) participated. In Experiment 1, 4 children were exposed to 3 sessions in each condition with a new set of stimuli in each session. In Experiment 2, 2 of the same children received repeated exposure to the same stimulus sets. Experiment 3, with new participants, was identical to Experiment 1, except visual and auditory stimuli overlapped during the presentation. Postsession probes documented emergent stimulus control over 1 or more vocal responses for 7 of the 8 participants. Participants were more likely to make echoic responses with the visual stimulus present in the word-first condition; however, emergent tact control was unaffected by the order of the stimulus presentation. Additional research is needed on stimulus-pairing procedures and on the role of echoic responding in emergent tact control.Keywords Children . Naming . Stimulus pairing . Tact . Verbal behavior The "tact" was defined by Skinner (1957) as a verbal operant in which the response form is controlled by "a particular object or event or a property of the object or event" (pp. 81-82). Although Skinner considered operant reinforcement to be primarily responsible for establishing the stimulus control that defines the tact (hereafter referred to as "tact control"), he also acknowledged (Skinner, 1957, pp. 359-360) that this type of stimulus control sometimes emerges without any apparent reinforcement of the target response form in the presence of the relevant stimulus. More recent behavioranalytic theories have hypothesized that emergent tact control is a product of a higher order (Horne & Lowe, 1996) or a generalized (e.g.,

Renal inflammation is prevalent in the chronic autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and drives the progression of kidney injury, which contributes to the morbidity and mortality. Inflammation in SLE results from a loss of self‐tolerance and the production of autoantibodies against nuclear antigens (e.g., anti‐double‐stranded (ds) DNA autoantibodies); however, other immunoregulatory mechanisms such as the cholinergic anti‐inflammatory pathway may also be dysregulated and contribute to aberrant systemic and renal inflammation in the disease. The cholinergic anti‐inflammatory pathway is a protective, neuroimmune mechanism thought to involve neurotransmission between the parasympathetic vagus and the sympathetic splenic nerves. Although a direct anatomical connection between the vagus and the splenic nerve is controversial, stimulation of these nerves results in a decrease in the production and release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines from splenic immune cells. In order to confirm the importance of the splenic nerve in this pathway, others have used 6‐hydroxydopamine (6OHDA), a neurotoxin that depletes catecholamines, to chemically denervate the spleen and thereby dampen the sympathetic component of the cholinergic anti‐inflammatory pathway. We hypothesized that splenic injection of 6OHDA would further disrupt the cholinergic anti‐inflammatory pathway in a mouse model of SLE and result in increased renal inflammation and worsened disease severity, which would highlight the importance of the splenic nerve in quelling renal inflammation. In the current study, female SLE and control mice were injected with 6OHDA (120 μg in 60 μl saline) or vehicle directly into the spleen at 33 weeks of age (n = 6/group). To confirm splenic denervation with 6OHDA, we utilized the glyoxylic acid condensation reaction on 12 μm spleen sections of representative animals and verified that catecholamine histofluorescence was diminished in 6OHDA‐treated mice (205 vs. 111 histofluorescent foci). Renal cortical TNF‐α (normalized to total protein) was increased in SLE mice compared to controls (3.1e6 ± 1.2e5 vs. 7.8e5 ± 1.6e4 intensity units; p = 0.029), and 6OHDA exacerbated this pro‐inflammatory cytokine in SLE mice (7.6e6 ± 2.4 intensity units; p = 0.048) with no effect in controls (1.8e6 ± 7.0e5 intensity units; p = 0.697). Anti‐dsDNA autoantibodies were elevated in SLE mice compared to controls (2.1e4 ± 5.7e3 vs. 1.0e4 ± 4.7e3 activity units; p = 0.013), but 6OHDA did not alter this measure of disease severity in SLE mice (1.8e4 ± 5.2e3 activity units; p = 0.692). Albumin excretion rate (AER) was elevated in SLE mice compared to controls (160.7 ± 28.0 vs. 2.7 ± 2.7 mg/dL; p < 0.001). 6OHDA accentuated the increase in AER in SLE mice (454.2 ± 150.2 mg/dL; p = 0.010) but had no effect in controls (27.5 ± 17.0 mg/dL; p = 0.754). In summary, 6OHDA aggravated renal inflammation and injury in SLE mice indicated by heightened renal cortical TNF‐α and AER. This suggests that chemical splenic denervation may disrupt endogenous, sympathetically‐mediated anti‐inflammatory mechanisms. Further studies are needed to confirm the role of the splenic nerve in regulating renal inflammation.Support or Funding InformationFunded by AHA grants 14SDG18320033 (KWM), 16PRE29910012 (GSP), and UNTHSC Intramural FundingThis abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.