Background:The demand for reconstructive breast procedures of various types has accelerated in recent years. Coupled with increased patient expectations, it has fostered the development of oncoplastic and reconstructive techniques in breast surgery. In the setting of postmastectomy reconstruction, patient satisfaction and quality of life are the most significant outcome variables when evaluating surgical success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life after implant breast reconstruction compared with autologous breast reconstruction.Materials and Methods:A cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 65 women who had completed postmastectomy implant-based or autologous reconstruction in the participating center were asked to complete the BREAST-Q (Reconstruction Module).Results:Data analysis demonstrated that women with autologous breast reconstruction were significantly more satisfied with their breasts (P = 0.0003) and with the overall outcome (P = 0.0001) compared with women with implant breast reconstruction. All other BREAST-Q parameters that were considered and observed were not significantly different between the 2 patient groups.Conclusions:Through statistical analysis, our results showed that patients who underwent autologous tissue reconstruction had better satisfaction with the reconstructed breast and the outcome, while both techniques appear to equally improve psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and chest satisfaction.

Since the early days of molecular biology, organ and tissue regeneration represents a challenging medical goal. However, only recently the advances in the understanding of the cellular components have enabled the promise to become a reality. In this vast panorama of new technologies, stem cells have progressively established themselves as the most effective and user-friendly regenerative therapeutic tool. Scientific meetings, workshops, conferences, and forums focused on translational science of regenerative technologies are today blooming all over the world. The audience questions and, even more, the very often controversial and conflicting explanations highlight the great deal of confusion regarding this new discipline that should be considered today a real independent medical specialty, requiring long-term studies and dedication. All the technologies able to separate and concentrate the adipose tissue (AT) and the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and their related clinical applications need to comply with a complex but still unclear regulatory frame, becoming everyday more severe and restrictive, this limiting their practical use. The aim of this manuscript is to overview the current status of the regulatory frame and few related ethical considerations and to describe the evolution in the way the adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is isolated, extracted, and concentrated, as well as, of the ongoing researches and related future perspectives. Considerations on the most controversial and still unclear points related to the regenerative medicine and surgery, seen from the perspective of a research group who dedicated their entire professional life to this field, are also provided. Level of evidence: Not ratable.