Introduction: We analysed patients with advanced nonesmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to address the effect of the timeline and reason for corticosteroid administration on survival outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data of non-oncogenic driven, advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs at Karolinska University Hospital, including the timeline and reason for steroid administration. Steroid administration was defined as > 10 mg prednisolone equivalent for 10 days. We subcategorized patients based on the aetiology of steroid administration into three subgroups: a) steroids for supportive reasons but not for cancer palliation; b) steroids for the palliation of cancer-related symptoms; c) steroids for the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Furthermore, to analyse the timeline, patients were categorised into two groups; those who received corticosteroids within 2 weeks before until 2 days after ICI initiation and those who received steroids later during their treatment course. Results: Analysed data from 196 patients showed 46.3% of patients received corticosteroids. Steroid administration due to irAEs did not affect overall survival (OS) (p Z 0.38) compared with the steroid naïve group. Only steroid administration for the palliation of cancer-related symptoms was an independent predictor for shorter OS (HR Z 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5e4.9). The timeline of steroid administration did not affect OS (p Z 0.456) in our cohort.
Using PET measurements of the 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax) in the tumors, corrected for partial volume effects, it was possible to differentiate the carcinoids from the hamartomas, but the clinically more aggressive atypical carcinoids could not be differentiated from the typical carcinoids.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.