QODD-ESP-12 is a reliable and valid instrument with good psychometric properties and can be used to assess QOD in a Spanish-speaking cancer PC population by phone interview.
Introduction
Patients upstaged to pT3 after partial nephrectomy (PN) may be at an increased risk of disease progression compared to those patients submitted to radical nephrectomy (RN). We sought to identify preoperative factors predicting pT3 upstaging in localized renal cell carcinoma.
Material and methods
Patients submitted to nephrectomy for clinically localized (cT1–cT2) renal cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2016 were identified from a prospective registry, those presenting with locally advanced or metastatic disease were excluded. Clinical factors, laboratory, and imaging using RENAL score, were analyzed. A multivariate analysis was performed looking for stage pT3a predictors.
Results
Two hundred and nine patients were included, 66% were men, with a mean age of 57 years. Mean tumor size was 49 ±31 mm. 19% were staged as pT3a. Of this group, 10% underwent a PN. Age, hypertension, presence of hematuria, creatinine levels, size and RENAL score were statistically associated with locally advanced stage. The variables of the RENAL score that were associated to pT3a stage were size, nearness to renal sinus/collector system and contact with main renal vessels. On the multivariate analysis, only age, size, and contact with renal vessels were found to predict upstaging. A model was developed which was able to predict stage pT3a with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.864 in the ROC curve.
Conclusions
Upstaging to pT3a is fairly common in clinically localized tumors. A formula that includes tumor size, age and contact with the main vessels on imaging, can help predict it. This should be considered when deciding if the patient is a candidate for nephron sparing surgery.
Objetivo: Comparar el resultado actual de tres técnicas quirúrgicas en pacientes intervenidos por Hiperplasia Benigna de Próstata (HPB); Enucleación láser de próstata (HoLEP), Resección transuretral (RTU) y Prostatectomía Abierta (PA). Enfermedad que actualmente presenta cambios en su presentación clínica y mayores comorbilidades al momento de la cirugía.Material y método: Análisis retrospectivo de 1. 211 pacientes consecutivos e intervenidos en un mismo centro por HPB entre 2008 y 2017 y con al menos 6 meses de evaluación postoperatoria. Se registró las características periperatorias y comorbilidades, comparando los resultados intra y post operatorios obtenidos según la técnica quirúrgica empleada. Se realizó análisis uni y bivariados en programa SPSS versión 17. Para comparar variables categóricas empleamos test exacto de Fisher y para las variables continuas la prueba de Mann-Whitney.Resultados: Al momento de la cirugía 769 pacientes (63,5%) se encuentran en terapia médica por HPB, 268 (22,1%) presentan retención urinaria y 212 (17,5%) se encuentran en terapia anticoagulante-antiagregante. Se realizó HoLEP en 423 pacientes (36,9%), RTU en 651 (56,9%) y PA en 71 (6,2%). Aquellos intervenidos por HoLEP tienen significativa mayor frecuencia de terapia anticoagulante preoperatoria que RTU (9,2% v/s 4,9 %), manteniendo similar tasa de transfusión en post operatorio (0,5%). La mayor necesidad de transfusión la presentan los intervenidos por PA 5,6%. El tiempo de cateterismo y estadía hospitalaria es significativamente más breve en quienes se someten a HoLEP; 3,7 días v/s 4,4 en RTU y 7,1 en PA. También resultan determinantes del tiempo estadía hospitalaria la edad, presencia de cardiopatía coronaria y falla renal. Al sexto mes de la cirugía los pacientes intervenidos por HoLEP tienen un significativo mejor flujo urinario máximo y menor volumen residual.Conclusiones: En esta serie, los pacientes con HBP al momento de requerir cirugía presentan condiciones que se asocian a mayor tiempo de hospitalización: edad, cardiopatía coronaria y falla renal. Confirmamos que aquellos intervenidos con HoLEP registran una hospitalización significativamente más breve y resultados funcionales similares a RTU y PA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.