Pathway analysis is often the first choice for studying the mechanisms underlying a phenotype. However, conventional methods for pathway analysis do not take into account complex protein-protein interaction information, resulting in incomplete conclusions. Previously, numerous approaches that utilize protein-protein interaction information to enhance pathway analysis yielded superior results compared to conventional methods. Hereby, we present pathfindR, another approach exploiting protein-protein interaction information and the first R package for active-subnetwork-oriented pathway enrichment analyses for class comparison omics experiments. Using the list of genes obtained from an omics experiment comparing two groups of samples, pathfindR identifies active subnetworks in a protein-protein interaction network. It then performs pathway enrichment analyses on these identified subnetworks. To further reduce the complexity, it provides functionality for clustering the resulting pathways. Moreover, through a scoring function, the overall activity of each pathway in each sample can be estimated. We illustrate the capabilities of our pathway analysis method on three gene expression datasets and compare our results with those obtained from three popular pathway analysis tools. The results demonstrate that literature-supported disease-related pathways ranked higher in our approach compared to the others. Moreover, pathfindR identified additional pathways relevant to the conditions that were not identified by other tools, including pathways named after the conditions.
Purpose The aim of our study is to compare the efficacy of positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting intraprostatic lesions in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy; additionally, investigate the benefits of rostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-MR software fusion images to the diagnosis. Methods Thirty patients, who underwent radical prostatectomy between June 2015 and April 2018, were included in the study. Subjects with gallium PSMA PET-CT and multiparametric prostate MRI performed according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v2 criteria in our clinic were included in the study. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT images were fused with MR sequences for analysis. Results The mean age of cases was 63.2 years (ranged from 45 to 79 years). Index lesions of 29 cases were detected by MRI and 22 of them by PET CT. Both modalities were found to be less sensitive for detection of bilaterality and multifocality (42.85% and 20% for MRI, 28.57% and 20% for PET CT, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between modalities. It was observed that if a clinically significant tumor focus was not detected by MRI, it was small (6 mm or less) in diameter or had a low Gleason score. Conclusions Software fusion PSMA PET-MRI increased the sensitivity of the index lesion identification compared with PSMA PET-CT and also increased the sensitivity of real lesion size identification compared with multiparametric prostate MRI.
PathfindR is a tool for pathway enrichment analysis utilizing active subnetworks. It identifies gene sets that form active subnetworks in a protein-protein interaction network using a list of genes provided by the user. It then performs pathway enrichment analyses on the identified gene sets. Further, using the R package pathview, it maps the user data on the enriched pathways and renders pathway diagrams with the mapped genes. Because many of the enriched pathways are usually biologically related, pathfindR also offers functionality to cluster these pathways and identify representative pathways in the clusters. PathfindR is built as a stand-alone package but it can easily be integrated with other tools, such as differential expression/methylation analysis tools, for building fully automated pipelines. In this article, an overview of pathfindR is provided and an example application on a rheumatoid arthritis dataset is presented and discussed.
Aims and Objectives: Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs) are pharmaceutical delivery systems that have advantages such as controlled drug release, long-term stability etc. Particle Size (PS) is one of the important criteria of SLNs. These factors affect drug release rate, bio-distribution etc. In this study, the formulation of SLNs using high-speed homogenization technique has been evaluated. The main emphasis of the work is to study whether the effect of mixing time and formulation ingredients on PS can be modeled. For this purpose, different machine learning algorithms have been applied and evaluated using the mean absolute error metric. Materials and Methods: SLNs were prepared by high-speed homogenizaton. PS, size distribution and zeta potential measurements were performed on freshly prepared samples. In order to model the formulation of the particles in terms of mixing time and formulation ingredients and evaluate the predictability of PS depending on these parameters, different machine learning algorithms were applied on the prepared dataset and the performances of the algorithms were also evaluated. Results: PS of SLNs obtained was in the range of 263-498nm. The results present that PS of SLNs can be best estimated by decision tree based methods, among which Random Forest has the least mean absolute error value with 0.028. As a result, the estimation of machine learning algorithms demonstrates that particle size can be estimated by both decision rule-based machine learning methods and function fitting machine learning methods. Conclusion: Our findings present that machine learning methods can be highly useful for determining formulation parameters for further research.
While pregnancy may accelerate glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) growth, parity and progesterone (P4) containing treatments (ie, hormone replacement therapy) reduce the risk of GBM development. In parallel, low and high doses of P4 exert stimulating and inhibitory actions on GBM growth, respectively. The mechanisms behind the high‐dose P4‐suppression of GBM growth is unknown. In the present study, we assessed the changes in growth and proteomic profiles when high‐dose P4 (100 and 300 µM) was administered in human U87 and A172 GBM cell lines. The xCELLigence system was used to examine cell growth when different concentrations of P4 (20, 50, 100, and 300 µM) was administered. The protein profiles were determined by two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis in both cell lines when 100 and 300 µM P4 were administered. Finally, the pathways enriched by the differentially expressed proteins were assessed using bioinformatic tools. Increasing doses of P4 blocked the growth of both GBM cells. We identified 26 and 51 differentially expressed proteins (fc > 2) in A172 and U87 cell lines treated with P4, respectively. Only the pro‐tumorigenic mitochondrial ornithine aminotransferase and anti‐apoptotic mitochondrial 60 kDa heat shock protein were downregulated in A172 cell line and U87 cell line when treated with P4, respectively. Detoxification of reactive oxygen species, cellular response to stress, glucose metabolism, and immunity‐related proteins were altered in P4‐treated GBM cell lines. The paradox on the effect of low and high doses of P4 on GBM growth is gaining attention. The mechanism related to the high dose of P4 on GBM growth can be explained by the alterations in detoxification mechanisms, stress, and immune response and glucose metabolism. P4 suppresses GBM growth and as it is nontoxic in comparison to classical chemotherapeutics, it can be used as a new strategy in GBM treatment in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.