The Spanish Central System is a Cenozoic pop-up with an E W to NE SW orientation that affects an the crust (thick-skinned tectonics). It shows antifonn geometry in the upper crust with thickening in the lower crust. Together -with the Iberian Chain it constitutes the most prominent mmmtainous structure of the Pyrenean foreland.The evolutionary patterns concerning the paleotopography of the interior of the Peninsula can be established by an analysis of the fo11owing data: gravimetric, topographical, macro and micro tectonic, sedimentological (infilling of the sedimentary basins of the relative foreland), P T t path from apatite fission tracks, paleoseismic and instrumental seismicity.Deformation is dearly asymmetric in the Central System as evidenced by the existence of an unique, large (crustal-scale) thrust at its southern border, while in the northern one there is a normal sequence of north verging thrusts, towards the Duero Basin, whose activity ended during the Lower Miocene. This deformation was accomplished lUlder triaxial compression, Oligocene Lower Miocene in age, marked by NW SE to NNW SSE shortening. Loca11y orientations of paleostresses deviate from that of the regional tensor, follo-wing a period of relative tectonic quiescence. During the Upper Miocene Pliocene, a reactivation of constrictive stress occurred and some structures underwent rejuvenation as a consequence of the action of tectonic stresses similar to those of today (lUliaxial extension to strike slip -with NW SE shortening direction). However, the westernmost areas show continuous activity throughout the whole of the Tertiary, with no apparent pulses. At the present time there is a moderate seismic activity in the Central System related to faults that were active during the Cenozoic, with the same kinematic characteristics.
[1] Integration of stress indicator data, gravity data, crustal kinematics data, and analysis of topography and recent vertical motions demonstrates the occurrence of consistently oriented spatial patterns of large-scale Alpine to recent intraplate deformation in Iberia. The inferred upper crustal and lithospheric deformation patterns and the timing of the associated expressions at or near the surface support the existence of a close coupling with plate boundary processes operating at the margins of Iberia. Patterns of lithosphere and upper crustal folds are oriented perpendicular to the main axis of present-day intraplate compression in Iberia inferred from structural analysis of stress indicator data and focal mechanism solutions. These findings suggest the presence of lithospheric folds, with wavelengths compatible with theoretical predictions of folding wavelengths of Variscan lithosphere. Stress-induced intraplate deformation set up by plate interactions is compatible with indications for the absence of present-day deep mantle-lithosphere interactions inferred from seismic tomography.
Apatite fission track (AFT) thermochronology of Precambrian and Paleozoic basement samples from southern Norway reveals a post-Paleozoic exhumation history, related to offshore Mesozoic and Cenozoic extensional basin development. The data indicate two major phases of rapid exhumation. A first Mesozoic phase started in the Triassic (-220 Ma) in the east and south of the study area and migrated to the west where Jurassic (-160 Ma) ages of exhumation predominate. A second event is indicated by thermal history modeling of AFT ages and track length distributions. It is inferred to be Neogene in age, initiated at about 30 Ma, and it produced a domal pattern of AFT isochrons which follow present-day topographic elevation. Youngest AFT ages (-100 Ma) are encountered at sealevel in the inner fjords near the areas of highest topography; ages increase radially outward to the mountain peaks and the coastlines. Forward modeling of age-elevation patterns suggests that Mesozoic geothermal gradients were 10-15øC/km higher than the present value of 20øC/km. During the Triassic and Jurassic, a total of 1.3-3.5 km of overburden was removed from the study area, assuming a 30øC/km geothermal gradient for that period. We attribute this to rift margin erosion as a result of erosional base level lowering and flank uplift, as evidenced by thick continental clastic sequences deposited in Triassic-Jurassic half grabens in the North Sea basins. We propose that 1.5-2.5 km of Neogene exhumation were a result of late stage domal uplift. This is supported by basinward dipping pre-Neogene strata in the basins surrounding southern Norway and the infill of a 1-to 2-km-thick Neogene sediment wedge containing various internal unconformities. Domal uplift probably started in the Late Oligocene, may have been amplified in the Pliocene, and was overprinted by Plio-Pleistocene glacial erosion. Maximum Neogene tectonic uplift is estimated at approximately 1-1.5 km, radially decreasing outward to a value <500 m near the shoreline. Neogene domal uplift is coincident with Oligocene and Pliocene plate reorganizations in the North Atlantic; similar Neogene domes are found around the Norwegian-Greenland Sea (i.e., Svalbard and the Barents Sea, northern Norway, east Greenland), suggesting a regional tectonic cause. The onset of Neogene uplift postdates major volcanism and continental breakup by-25 m.y. and predates Plio-Pleistocene glaciations. Its origin is possibly a combina-Copyright 1995 by the American Geophysical Union. Paper number 95TC00088. 0278-7407/95/95TC-00088510.00 tion of induced mantle convection, resulting in thermal erosion of the lithosphere, and the operation of intraplate stresses. Introduction It has become apparent in recent years that rifted margins may record significant postrift (late stage) uplift events, in addition to better understood synrift flank uplift [e.g., Cloetingh and Kooi, 1992; Sales, 1992]. For instance, Cloetingh et al. [1990; 1992] stress the importance of accelerated postrift subsidence, in conjunction with margin upl...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.