In a multicenter study conducted at four Danish hospital pediatric departments, the parents of 472 consecutive children were informed of this project to determine the incidence of intolerance of food additives among children referred to an allergy clinic with symptoms of asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis, or urticaria. After a 2-week period on an additive-free diet, the children were challenged with the eliminated additives. The food additives investigated were coloring agents, preservatives, citric acid, and flavoring agents. Carbonated "lemonade" containing the dissolved additives was used for the open challenge. Two doses were used: a low dose and a 10-fold higher dose. Gelatin capsules were used for a double-blind challenge. The children were 4-15 years old, and they were attending an outpatient pediatric clinic for the first time. Of the 379 patients who entered the study, 44 were excluded and 335 were subjected to open challenge. A total of 23 children developed positive reactions after the open challenge. Sixteen of these patients accepted the double-blind challenge, and six showed a positive reaction to preservatives (atopic dermatitis, asthma, rhinitis), coloring agents (atopic dermatitis, asthma, urticaria, gastrointestinal symptoms), and citric acid (atopic dermatitis, gastrointestinal symptoms). The incidence of intolerance of food additives was 2% (6/335), as based on the double-blind challenge, and 7% (23/335), as based on the open challenge with lemonade. Children with atopic skin symptoms had a statistically increased risk of a positive reaction. This may have consequences for the future clinical investigation of children with atopic cutaneous symptoms.

No abstract

Summary Of thirty‐eight children, who were immunized with mould extracts, seven (19%) were withdrawn from hyposensitization due to serious side‐effects clinically consistent with a type III reaction. These seven children exhibited a two‐ to four‐fold increase in circulating precipitating‐antibodies to the injected extracts, and had shown a slight increase in precipitating antibodies to the mould extracts used before hyposensitization. A further fourteen patients, also hyposensitized with mould extracts but without side effects did not develop precipitating antibodies. It is suggested that hyposensitization with mould extracts may be hazardous in children who may have a primary ‘immune imbalance’ with a risk of provoking type III reactions.

No abstract

One hundred and six of 503 (21%) consecutive children with asthma, who from 1979 to 1983 commenced hyposensitization therapy, were prospectively studied on the safety of immunotherapy. More than 80% of the patients completed therapy without side effects. Thirteen patients were withdrawn from hyposensitization due to moderate and predictable, but intolerable, side effects such as asthma/rhinitis, urticaria and subcutaneous nodules and hypersensitivity to aluminium. However, more alarming was the outcome in six children, who after an uneventful course of immunotherapy and after several months on maintenance therapy, suddenly, 5 to 20 min (mean 10 min) following an earlier tolerable allergen injection, developed severe, anaphylactic reactions, in three of them nearly fatal. Mould extracts were responsible for the most frequent and serious side effects (Alternaria iridis/alternata, 3 patients, Cladosporium herbarum, 8 patients). Furthermore, serious, but not immediately life-threatening, anaphylactic reactions occurred in two children treated with Phleum pratense. On the other hand, hyposensitization with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was very well tolerated.