BackgroundVery old critical ill patients are a rapid expanding group. To better understand the magnitude of the challenges involved in intensive care practice for an ageing population and discuss a rational allocation of resources, healthcare practitioners need a reliable evaluation of frailty. In order to promote the adequate use of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in a wider panel of countries, we aimed to develop, validate and characterise a French (FR) version from the original English (EN) CFS.MethodsWe included participants recruited prospectively for the observational “The very old intensive care patient: A multinational prospective observation study” (VIP Study) at Geneva University Hospitals (FR speaking hospital). A FR version of the CFS was obtained by translation (EN- > FR) and back translation (FR- > EN). The final CFS-FR was then evaluated twice on the same participants with at least a 2-week interval by FR-speaking doctors and nurses.ResultsInter-rater reliability was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76–0.93) between doctors for the original CFS version and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.57–0.87) between nurses for the FR version. Inter-rater variability between doctor and nurse was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.56–0.87) for the original version, and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.52–0.85) for the FR version.Test-retest (stability) with the original vs the FR version was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.72–0.93) for doctors and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.76–0.93) for nurses.Differences between the evaluations of the CFS-EN and CSF-FR were not different from 0, with a mean difference of 0.06 (95%CI -0.24, 0.36) for the EN version and − 0.03 (95%CI -0.47, 0.41) for the FR version. Average original version ratings were slightly lower than FR version ratings, though this difference did not reach significance: -0.29 (95%CI -0.54, 0.04).ConclusionIn this prospective cohort of very old intensive care participants we developed and tested the basic psychometric properties (internal consistency, reproducibility) of a French version of the CFS. This manuscript provides clinically meaningful psychometric properties that have not been previously reported in any other language, including in the original EN version.The French cultural adaptation of this CFS has adequate psychometric properties for doctors or nurses to evaluate frailty in very old intensive care patients.

As highlighted by the last international consensus definition for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3), sepsis comes from a complex relationship between a pathogen and a dysregulated host response. To date, the treatment of sepsis is based on antimicrobial treatment, source control, and organ support. Extracorporeal blood purification therapies have been proposed as adjuvant therapies to modulate the dysregulated inflammatory response. These therapies aim mostly at removing inflammatory mediators (cytokines) and endotoxins from the blood. However, so far, they failed to clearly demonstrate an improvement in patient survival when evaluated in randomized trials. Recently, new devices directly targeting the primary determinants of sepsis, e.g., the pathogen itself and the host immune cells, have been developed. This short review aimed at presenting new blood purification devices that have recently been developed to target pathogens and immune cells. For each, we will present the mechanism of action of the therapy and discuss the related literature.

The present pilot study investigated whether respiratory variation in subclavian vein (SCV) diameters correlates with fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Monocentric, prospective clinical study on fluid responsiveness in adult sedated, mechanically ventilated ICU patient, monitored with the PiCCO™ system (Pulsion Medical System, Germany), and requiring a fluid challenge (FC). A 10-min fluid bolus of 500 mL of 0.9% saline was administered. Cardiac output (CO) and dynamic parameters [stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV)] measured by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis (PiCCO™) as well as classical hemodynamic parameters were recorded at baseline and after FC. Fluid responsiveness was described as an increase in CO of ≥ 15%. Ultrasound measurements obtained in the subclavian long-axis view were used to calculate the SCV index. A cut-off value for SCV variation for the prediction of fluid responsiveness was determined using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Nine of 20 FCs (45%) induced an increase in CO of ≥ 15%. At baseline, the SCV index was greater in responders than in non-responders (34.0 ± 21.4 vs. 9.0 ± 5.5; p = 0.0005). Diagnostic performance for the SCV index revealed a cut-off value of 14 with a sensitivity of 100% [Confidence interval (CI) 95% (90; 100)] and a specificity of 82% [CI 95% (48; 98)] for the prediction of fluid responsiveness. Other parameters, such as SVV and PPV, could not predict fluid responsiveness. The correlation coefficient between CO variation and the SCV index was 0.73 (p < 0.001). The SCV index was a reliable, non-invasive parameter for the prediction of fluid responsiveness at the bedside of mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients in this pilot study.