No abstract

Cytogenetic tests were performed on operating room personnel working in a Turin hospital. The aim of our study was to determine if any chromosome damage was caused by the use of anaesthetic gases. Blood samples were collected from 45 hospital workers: 15 exposed to anaesthetic gases, 15 exposed to both anaesthetic gases and ionizing radiations and 15 controls. An examination of sister-chromatid exchanges did not highlight significant differences when exposed subjects were compared to controls. Chromosomal aberrations were significantly higher (P = 0.029) in all the exposed personnel, while no statistically significant increase was observed in staff exclusively in contact with anaesthetic gases. Moreover there was a positive correlation for chromosome aberrations with the years of employment, when the entire exposed population was considered and when personnel from the different operating rooms were considered separately. Both sister-chromatid exchange and chromosomal aberrations were higher among smokers though differences were not statistically significant.

No abstract

Hospital workers are occupationally exposed to various agents known or suspected to induce chromosome damage, the most studied being ionizing radiation. To determine the extent of chromosome damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes in this population, taking into account temporal changes and job titles, a re‐analysis of cytogenetic studies performed in four Italian laboratories in the period 1965–1993 was carried out. A total of 871 hospital workers and 617 controls, mainly coming from ad hoc studies or surveillance programs in occupational groups potentially exposed to ionizing radiation, were examined. The exposed to controls frequency ratio of chromosome aberrations was evaluated as the measure of effect within each dataset by job title, using multivariate Poisson regression analysis, which allowed an efficient control of confounding. Increased frequency of chromosome‐type aberrations among exposed subjects was found in all datasets, especially in those dealing with older data. Significantly higher frequencies are reported for various job titles, particularly for orthopedists, radiologists, anesthesists, and nurses among paramedical occupations. Decrease in exposure to ionizing radiation in hospital workers was documented through a targeted study in the critical group of radiologists. A similar time‐related reduction in the frequency of chromosome‐type aberrations also has been reported by the surveillance studies carried out over the most recent decades. These data substantiate the use of chromosome‐type aberrations as biomarkers of exposure in this occupational setting in the period evaluated. However, the increases observed also in workers with doubtful exposure to ionizing radiation indicate that other chromosome‐damaging agents may be involved and, in turn, suggest the extension of surveillance to a larger number of occupations. Am. J. Ind. Med. 31:353–360, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The karyotypes of Macaca fuscata and Cercocebus aterrrimus are compared after G, C and AgNOR banding. Although it is often assumed that the 42-chromosome monkeys (species of the genera Macaca, Papio, and Cercocebus) are identical at the chromosomal level, a number of clear and consistent differences between the karyotypes of these two taxa are described. These differences include one pericentric inversion and differences in staining intensity, particularly in centromeric and pericentromeric areas. It is probable that high resolution chromosome techniques could reveal more differences between taxa in the 42-chromosome group than are now believed to exist. It is therefore probable that karyological data could provide insight into the phylogenetic relationships in this group of Old World monkeys.