A total of 251 adults with chronic sinusitis were enrolled into this prospective multicentre, double-blind, double-placebo comparison of ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) with amoxy-cillin/clavulanic acid (500 mg three times daily). The diagnosis of chronic sinusitis (persistence of clinical symptoms for at least 3 months) was confirmed by computerized tomography scan and/or sinusoscopy prior to therapy. Patients at inclusion had purulent or muco-purulent rhinorrhoea. Staphylococcus aureus (n = 45), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 35), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 32) and enterobacteriaceae (n = 31) were isolated from pre-treatment aspirates of the middle meatus. Treatment lasted 9 days, at the end of which nasal discharge disappeared in 71/118 (60.2%) patients of the ciprofloxacin group and 69/123 (56.1%) of those in the amoxycillin/clavulanic acid group. The clinical cure and bacteriological eradication rates were 58.6% versus 51.2% and 88.9% versus 90.5% for ciprofloxacin and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid, respectively. These differences were not significant, however, amongst patients who had a positive initial culture and who were evaluated 40 days after treatment. Ciprofloxacin recipients had a significantly higher cure rate than those treated with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (83.3% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.043). Clinical tolerance was significantly better with ciprofloxacin (p = 0.012), essentially due to a large number of gastro-intestinal related side-effects in the amoxycillin/clavulanic acid group (n = 35). Ciprofloxacin proved to be at least as effective as amoxycillin/clavulanic acid. The superior safety profile, a twice daily dosage regimen, suggests that ciprofloxacin may be a useful therapeutic alternative for the treatment of chronic sinusitis.
A study was made of 100 homogeneous CT scans of the petrous part of the temporal bone to determine whether or not the arcuate eminence (AE) is a good landmark for the superior semicircular canal (SSCC) in the suprapetrous approach to the internal acoustic meatus which is used in the extirpation of acoustic neuromas. Direct measurements were made on consecutive coronal sections, 1 mm thick. The AE was absent from the petrous surface in 15% of cases. It corresponded to the relief of the SSCC in 37% of cases; laterally, however, it was separated from the petrous cortex by bone whose thickness varied from 0.5 to 5 mm. Finally, in 48% of cases, the AE was not a good landmark for the canal although nonetheless it participated in the development of this bulge in 46% of cases, always lying towards the medial border of the pneumatized eminence. In addition, study of the coronal sections with MRI allowed us to confirm that the AE does not routinely correspond to the imprint of a temporal sulcus. The AE, whose presence on the petrous surface is due to the combined effects of the SSCC, the air cells of the petrous part of the temporal bone and the temporal sulci, is only a good guide to the SSCC in 37% of cases and should not be considered as a reliable surgical landmark.
The efficacy and tolerability of ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) was compared with that of amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (500 mg three times daily) in 76 patients with acute exacerbations of chronic non-cholesteatomatous suppurative otitis media enrolled in this open randomized multicentre trial. A total of 40 ciprofloxacin-treated patients and 35 amoxycillin/clavulanic acid-treated patients were evaluable for clinical efficacy following the 9-day treatment period. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the main pathogen isolated prior to treatment. At the end of treatment, otorrhoea had disappeared in 57.5% of the ciprofloxacin group and 37.1% of the amoxycillin/clavulanic acid group (p = 0.04). Bacterial eradication rate was also significantly greater with ciprofloxacin (69.7%) than with amoxycillin/ clavulanic acid (27.3%). Both treatments were well tolerated. Ciprofloxacin appears to be an effective treatment of chronic otitis media, and superior to amoxycillin/clavulanic acid.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.