Reciprocal translocations, the most frequent structural aberration in humans, are mainly transmitted by one of the parents. In order to analyze the chromosomal content of the spermatozoa from carriers of chromosomal reorganizations, two methods have been used, karyotyping of sperm chromosomes by the human-hamster system and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in decondensed sperm nuclei. In this work, we review 92 sperm chromosome segregation studies from 85 different reciprocal translocation carriers, including a triple translocation carrier. Using the human-hamster method, a total of 5,818 spermatozoa from 44 reciprocal translocation carriers have been analyzed, 43 of them carrying a single reciprocal translocation and one was a carrier of a double reciprocal translocation. A segregation analysis in a carrier of a t(2;22;11) has been also reported. Carrying out FISH in sperm nuclei, a total of 237,042 spermatozoa from 46 reciprocal translocation carriers have been analyzed. Six of these were also analyzed by the human-hamster system. Taking into account both methods, a total of 76 different reciprocal translocations have been studied. In 74 of these 76 translocations, the reorganization occurs between autosomes, and in the other two, the Y chromosome is involved. Although along general lines, there are similarities between the results obtained by the two methods of analysis, variations are observed when the distribution of the different types of segregations that produce imbalances is compared. As a general rule reciprocal translocation carriers produce more unbalanced sperm than normal or balanced sperm. The results reported also corroborate that the proportion of unbalanced forms depends on the characteristics of the reorganization and that it varies widely. Thus the importance of performing a detailed meiotic behavior analysis for each particular translocation in order to obtain enough information to give adequate genetic counseling is stressed. Aspects as to the possible overestimation of 3:1 segregations or the presence of interchromosomal effects still need to be elucidated.
Using the human sperm–hamster oocyte fusion technique and whole chromosome painting, we studied sperm chromosome segregation in a male heterozygous for a complex chromosome rearrangement, 46,XY,–2,+der(2)t(2;11)(q13; q23),–11,+der(11)t(11;22)(q23;q11.2),–22,+der(22)t(2;22)(q13; q11.2). A total of 208 sperm complements were analyzed. The frequency of sperm carrying a normal or a balanced complement was 13.5% (9.62% and 3.85%, respectively). The frequency of unbalanced sperm was 86.5% (64.9% from 3:3 segregation, including 30 different types; 20.7% from 4:2 segregation, including 21 different types; and 0.96% from 5:1 segregation, including 2 different types). The sex ratio, determined in 134 sperm complements, did not differ from the expected 1:1 ratio. The results obtained in this study are compatible with the formation, during the synaptic process, of a complex hexavalent figure involving chromosomes 2, 11, and 22. The behavior and segregation of this complex figure would explain the high frequency (86.5%) of unbalanced complements observed in this carrier.
We have studied the meiotic segregation of a reciprocal translocation t(5;7)(q21;q32) in a male carrier, using the human sperm-hamster oocyte fusion technique and the whole chromosome painting. A total of 296 sperm complements were analysed by dual chromosome painting. The frequencies of alternate, adjacent-1, adjacent-2 and 3:1 segregation were 49.7%, 32.4%, 16.2% and 1.7% respectively. Aneuploidy frequencies for chromosomes not involved in the translocation were determined by FISH on decondensed sperm heads using probes from chromosomes X, Y, 6, 18 and 21. A total of 20 118 spermatozoa was analysed, 10 201 by twocolour FISH (probes for chromosomes 6 and 21) and 9917 by three-colour FISH (probes for chromosomes X, Y, and 18). There was no evidence of an interchromosomal effect, since disomy frequencies were within the range of normal controls.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.