Type 1 von Willebrand disease (vWD) is generally regarded clinically as 'mild' and the obstetrical-gynaecological features have not been fully described. We administered a patient questionnaire and provider survey of the medical and quality of life aspects of childbirth and menstruation to 99 type 1 vWD patients and compared the patients presently menstruating (n=81) to a cohort of 150 menstruating females in the general population. The following measurements had a statistically higher proportion in the vWD group: number of tampons/towels used for a typical menstrual cycle (P=0. 002); percentage reporting that clothes are stained by menses (P = 0. 001); past or present history of anaemia (P = 0.001); childbirth-related bleeding (P=0.001); and childbirth-related bleeding necessitating RBC transfusion (P=0.002). Quality of life assessment of the impact of menses in both of the above cohorts was measured by a Likert scale using seven quality of life parameters. Compared to the control group, the vWD patients had a significantly higher score, with P-values of < 0.0001 for each parameter. Hormonal interventions for menorrhagia in the vWD patients were < or = 50% effective. Menorrhagia resulted in red blood cell transfusions in 6% of patients, dilatation and curettage in 17% and hysterectomy in 13%. Despite the common connotation of type 1 vWD as clinically 'mild', childbirth and the monthly challenge to haemostasis presented by menstruation result in a substantial degree of morbidity in females with type 1 vWD. These results support the rationale for ongoing international efforts to increase awareness of vWD as a cause for menorrhagia and to improve the quality of life in females with known vWD.

The optimal treatment of patients with von Willebrand's disease (vWD) remains to be defined. Moreover, it has not been firmly established which, if any, commonly measured parameters of von Willebrand factor (vWF) protein in the plasma are useful in guiding treatment. To better understand what guidelines physicians follow in the management of vWD, we surveyed 194 North American physicians who are members of the Hemophilia Research Society. Ninety-nine per cent of responding physicians depend on factor VIII (FVIII):C, vWF:RCo activity and vWF:AG to diagnose vWD, while only 49% use the bleeding time. The minimal goals of treatment for patients undergoing major surgery/trauma or central nervous system haemorrhage were FVIII:C and vWF:RCo activity greater than 80% while levels of more than 50% for minor surgery and dental extractions were considered adequate. Treatment of vWD was based on the type of vWD with type 1 patients being treated most often with desmopressin acetate (DDAVP) alone, types 2A and 2B patients with a combination of DDAVP and a vWF-containing FVIII product, type 3 patients with vWF-containing concentrate. Viral infections, including human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis A, B and C viruses, and parvovirus have been seen in vWD and the efficacy of viral attenuation processes is a major criterion for the selection of treatment by physicians. Based on this survey, prospective studies need to be designed to address the clinical efficacy, safety and predictive value of laboratory monitoring of patients with vWD.