The paper reviews the different options for the combination of vertical- and horizontal-flow beds used in hybrid reed bed/wetland systems. The design and performance of these systems are briefly described. The importance of the oxygen transfer capacity of the different arrangements to their performance and their size is discussed. Alternative methods for denitrification are briefly described.

The paper reviews the development of the vertical flow (VF) reed beds/constructed wetlands over the past 20 years. The performance of VF systems (and their use within hybrid systems) is analysed by reference to a number of brief case studies. The oxygen transfer rate (OTR) achieved is absolutely critical to the sizing of the systems. The author reviews the reported OTRs and comments on the existing design equations proposed for calculation of the area of beds. The 1st generation of VF systems used a set of parallel beds that were dosed one at a time in rotation and then rested for a period of days because there was considerable concern (based on early experience) that they would become clogged. In the past 10 years a number of new designs of 2nd generation VF beds have been built which make use of a single bed and hence operate without any resting periods. The hydraulic loading rate and the selection of the bed media, which are critical to the design and hence successful operation of these 2nd generation compact VF beds, are described. It is now possible to produce a very high quality of effluent from VF beds alone sized at 2 m2/pe when treating domestic sewage.

No abstract

The UK Water Industry first became interested in Reed Bed Treatment Systems for sewage in 1985. Early problems were experienced with soil-based horizontal-flow systems of the Root Zone type. The problems were overcome by national co-ordination of a development programme and international co-operation by an EC Expert Contact Group. A number of different types of systems have now been developed and the systems are now being accepted. The paper reviews the development of these systems for secondary and tertiary treatment and nitrification and mentions development of systems for other forms of treatment. The design changes made to overcome the problems are described. These include the gradual move to the use of gravel-based systems because of the difficulty experienced with over-land flow in the soil systems. The sizing of the systems is described together with performance data for the original horizontal-flow and the more recently developed vertical-flow systems. Treatment at secondary and tertiary levels is illustrated and the potential for nitrification. Early problems with reed growth have been overcome by planting with port-grown seedlings. After 10 years the process is generally accepted by the Water Industry as an appropriate treatment for villages and there are now between 200 and 300 systems in operation.

The paper reviews the current capabilities of processes for phosphorus and nitrogen removal in relation to the EC urban waste water treatment Directive. The Directive is briefly described and the implications for the UK are discussed. This is followed by a review of biological and chemical processes for nutrient removal with special reference to their current state of application and performance. Particular attention is paid to processes for biological phosphorus removal which, in the past, was said to be less reliable than the chemical options but which is now being more widely applied in other parts of Europe as well as South Africa and North America. Processes for modifying both activated sludge and biological filter systems to meet the Directive are briefly described.