Summary Interleukin 2 (IL-2) immunotherapy has met with limited success in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and malignant melanoma (MM). However, non-responders still account for up to 80% of those patients receiving IL-2. A high concentration of soluble IL-2 receptor (sIL-2R) is commonly found in the blood of such patients. We investigated the possibility that high sIL-2R concentration pretreatment may interfere with the bioavailability of IL-2. The mean concentration of sIL-2R in plasma from patients with MM, RCC and head and neck cancer was 3378 U ml-', 8778 U ml-' and 764 U ml-' respectively, compared with 1315 U ml-' in plasma from healthy volunteers. Inclusion of plasma from patients with RCC and MM patient plasma in cytotoxic T-lymphocyte leukaemic (CTLL) cell/IL-2 assays inhibited the ability of CTLL cells to respond to IL-2, and an inverse correlation was found between the concentration of sIL-2R and the growth response of CTLL cell to IL-2 (r = -0.86, P = 0.003). Plasma with soluble IL-2R concentrations greater than 3000 U ml-' produced a reduction in cell growth of more than 50% when included in CTLL IL-2 assays. The addition of increasing concentrations of IL-2 to cultures containing suppressive plasma failed to restore CTLL cell growth response to normal. Failure to saturate sIL-2R by exogenous IL-2 addition therefore suggests that another factor, initially present at a concentration similar to the sIL-2R concentration, is responsible for the observed effect. Determination of the suppressive effect of patient plasma as presented here may allow more effective IL-2 dosing schedules.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a randomized phase II trial the efficacy and toxicity of combination biochemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. Sixty-five patients with metastatic melanoma (ECOG performance status 0 or 1) were randomized to receive intravenous BCNU 100 mg m(-2) (day 1, alternate courses), cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) (days 1-3), DTIC 220 mg m(-2) (days 1-3) and oral tamoxifen 40 mg (BCDT regimen) with (n = 35) or without (n = 30) subcutaneous interleukin 2 (IL-2) 18 x 10(6) iu t.d.s. (day - 2), 9 x 10(6) iu b.d. (day - 1 and 0) and interferon 2 alpha (IFN-alpha) 9 MU (days 1-3). Evidence for immune activation was determined by flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks up to six courses depending on response. The overall response rate of BCDT with IL-2/IFN-alpha was 23% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-40%] with one complete response (CR) and seven partial responses (PR), and for BCDT alone 27% (95% CI 12-46%) with eight PRs; the median durations of response were 2.8 months and 2.5 months respectively. Sites of response were similar in both groups. There was no difference between the two groups in progression-free survival or overall survival (median survival 5 months for BCDT with IL-2/IFNalpha and 5.5 months for BCDT alone). Although 3 days of subcutaneous IL-2 resulted in significant lymphopenia, evidence of immune activation was indicated by a significant rise in the percentage of CD56- (NK cells) and CD3/HLA-DR-positive (activated T cells) subsets, without any change in the percentage of CD4 or CD4 T-cell subsets. Toxicity assessment revealed a significantly higher incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in patients treated with combination chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone (37% vs 13%, P = 0.03) and a higher incidence of grade 3/4 flu-like symptoms (20% vs 10%) and fatigue (26% vs 13%). The addition of subcutaneous IL-2 and IFNalpha to BCDT chemotherapy in a randomized phase II trial resulted in immune activation but did not improve response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma, and indeed may increase some treatment-related toxicity.

We vaccinated metastatic melanoma patients with irradiated, autologous melanoma cells genetically engineered to secrete interleukin 2 (IL-2) to investigate whether an anti-tumor immune response would be induced. Melanoma cell cultures were established from surgical specimens and were engineered to secrete IL-2 by infection with recombinant retrovirus. Twelve patients were vaccinated subcutaneously one, two, or three times with approximately 10(7) irradiated, autologous, IL-2-secreting tumor cells. Treatment was well tolerated, with local reactions at 11 of 24 injection sites and minor systemic symptoms of fever and headache after 6 injections. One patient developed anti-tumor DTH after the first vaccination and showed an increased response after the second vaccination. Anti-autologous tumor CTLs could be detected prevaccination in the peripheral blood of seven patients and their activity increased after vaccination in four patients. No UICC-defined clinical responses were seen, but three patients had stable disease for 7-15 months, one of whom has not yet progressed (15+ months). Thus, patient vaccination with autologous, genetically engineered tumor cells is feasible and safe. Anti-tumor DTH and CTLs can be induced in some patients with such a vaccine.

SUMMARY Gram‐positive bacteria, which lack lipopolysaccharide (LPS), produce a septic‐shock‐like condition, accompanied by release of pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Various components of the bacteria may be responsible for this. We stimulated a whole blood system with heat‐inactivated Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 14 (S14) bacteria, with pneumococcal S14 capsular polysaccharide (PPS S14) and with PPS S14 coated on to latex beads, to compare interleukin 6 (IL‐6) and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) production over a six hour period, to ascertain the contribution of PPS to the inflammatory response. This was compared with the response to LPS. After sonication of the bacteria, their PPS content was estimated by an enzyme‐linked immunoabsorbent assay, to compare this with the concentration of free PPS needed to generate cytokine release. The whole bacteria elicited a much larger cytokine response than the equivalent amount of PPS alone, whereas the PPS‐coated beads gave minimal response. The different cytokine responses to PPS and LPS suggest that there are differences in the receptors and/or signalling pathways for Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria. We conclude that the estimated amount of PPS in the bacteria is not enough to account for the large cytokine response we observed. Since PPS could not be shown to contribute significantly to cytokine induction, specific antibodies to PPS would not play any significant role in combating cytokine release associated with pneumococcal infection and possible septic shock. This needs to be considered in production of future vaccines.