Background and Objectives Sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassaemia, particularly the β‐type, represent major sources of morbidity. Recommended treatment includes regular blood transfusion following highly uniform strategies across thalassaemia units and monitoring related complications including alloimmunization. This complex problem depends on donor–recipient antigenic diversity, the patient's immune status and specific circumstances such as pregnancy. Materials and Methods We examined alloimmunization against RBC antigens and autoimmunization in 983 patients with thalassaemia and SCD in Greece, in relation to applied RBC antigen matching policies and other factors possibly relevant in reducing the rate of alloimmunization and delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR). Results Up to 2010, 11.6% of all patients had history of alloimmunization and 7.3% of autoimmunization. Frequency was highest in thalassaemia intermedia followed by sickle–thalassaemia and thalassaemia major. New alloimmunization was low at 1.4% after 2010, corresponding to a risk of 1:9405 units of RBCs transfused. Despite the very high transfusion burden in the chronically transfused patients, the use of extended matched donor blood is proven effective in reducing the rate of alloimmunization. Conclusion Multiple RBC alloantibodies represent a small but difficult to manage risk for responders prone to combination with autoimmunization. DHTR with hyperhaemolysis is a major clinical problem in haemoglobinopathies, especially during the gestational period and delivery in patients who escape expert medical follow‐up. Progress in the safety and quality of blood transfused in these patients is expected to contribute to prolongation of their life expectancy and to reproduction. Investigation of HLA and other antibodies in patients prone to developing RBC antibodies is suggested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.