The term Anthropocene, proposed and increasingly employed to denote the current interval of anthropogenic global environmental change, may be discussed on stratigraphic grounds. A case can be made for its consideration as a formal epoch in that, since the start of the Industrial Revolution, Earth has endured changes sufficient to leave a global stratigraphic signature distinct from that of the Holocene or of previous Pleistocene interglacial phases, encompassing novel biotic, sedimentary, and geochemical change. These changes, although likely only in their initial phases, are sufficiently distinct and robustly established for suggestions of a Holocene-Anthropocene boundary in the recent historical past to be geologically reasonable. The boundary may be defined either via Global Stratigraphic Section and Point ("golden spike") locations or by adopting a numerical date. Formal adoption of this term in the near future will largely depend on its utility, particularly to earth scientists working on late Holocene successions. This datum, from the perspective of the far future, will most probably approximate a distinctive stratigraphic boundary.
Since its designation as the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the base of the Silurian System, the choice of Dob's Linn, Southern Scotland, has received criticism due to the difficulties of relating its well-constrained graptolite biostratigraphy to shallow-water sequences elsewhere. Kerogen samples from across the Ordovician-Silurian boundary interval at Dob's Linn have yielded carbon stable-isotope signatures consistent with those recorded elsewhere, in particular showing a clear positive 13 C excursion in the terminal Ordovician. The architecture of the 13 C curve from Dob's Linn enables very high-resolution stratigraphic subdivision and direct correlation between the deep water Dob's Linn section and time-equivalent carbonate shelf deposits. An integrated stratigraphic scheme using isotope stratigraphy and biostratigraphy of graptolites, conodonts and shelly faunas has been constructed. This direct correlation shows that the shallow water successions, including the former stratotype candidate at Anticosti Island, are generally incomplete, with hiatuses related to the rapid sea-level changes during the Hirnantian stage. This confirms and greatly increases the global utility of Dob's Linn as a boundary stratotype.
Two major rhyolitic tephra units (Lower and Upper Acigöl Tuffs) have been erupted from the Acigöl Complex. The Lower Acigöl Tuff (>13km
3
uncompacted volume) was erupted more than
c.
180 ka ago, forming an extensive Plinian pumice-fall deposit with associated ashfall and ignimbrite. Well-developed ignimbrite veneer facies are preserved where the pyroclastic flows passed over hilly topography. Following the eruption, a thick rhyolite coulée (Bogazköy obsidian) was extruded. The Upper Acigöl Tuff eruption (age 70 < t< 150 ka) generated a second major Plinian deposit, an ignimbrite preserved up to 24 km from the vent, and an 80 m thick proximal succession of surge and fallout deposits; it resulted in collapse of the 6×5 km Acigöl caldera. The two major tuffs are chemically similar but can be distinguished on the basis of lithic populations. Subsequent rhyolitic activity formed the
c.
0.25 km
3
dome of Kocadag Tepe (c.70ka) and five dome/maar clusters (c. 20 ka). Late Quaternary and/or Holocene basalts and andesites surround the Acigöl caldera, which developed in a zone of sinistral shear associated with approximate N-S compression. Vent distribution patterns, the eruption of young basalts, and the crystal-poor nature of the
c.
20 ka rhyolites are consistent with basaltic stoking of a sizeable silicic magma chamber beneath the Acigöl Complex.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.