Tiotropium, a novel once-daily inhaled anticholinergic, has been shown to improve lung function over a 24-h period. In order to extend these findings, health-outcomes were evaluated over 1 yr in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.Spirometric results, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), salbutamol use and effects on dyspnoea, health-related quality of life and COPD exacerbations were assessed in two identical 1-yr randomized double-blind double-dummy studies of tiotropium 18mg once daily (n=356) compared with ipratropium 40mg q.i.d. (n=179).Screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were 1.25¡0.43 L (41.9¡12.7% of the predicted value) (tiotropium) and 1.18¡0.37 L (39.4¡10.7% pred) (ipratropium). Trough FEV1 at 1 yr improved by 0.12¡0.01 L with tiotropium and declined by 0.03¡0.02 L with ipratropium (pv0.001). Significant improvement in PEFR, salbutamol use, Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, and the St George9s Respiratory Questionnaire total and impact scores were seen with tiotropium (pv0.01). Tiotropium reduced the number of exacerbations (by 24%, pv0.01), and increased time to first exacerbation (pv0.01) and time to first hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation (pv0.05) compared with ipratropium. Apart from an increased incidence of dry mouth in the tiotropium group, adverse events were similar between treatments.Tiotropium was effective in improving dyspnoea, exacerbations, health-related quality of life and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and exceeds the benefits seen with ipratropium. The data support the use of tiotropium once-daily as first-line maintenance treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

No abstract

This study compared the bronchodilator effects of tiotropium, formoterol and both combined in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A total of 71 COPD patients (mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 37% predicted) participated in a randomised, double-blind, three-way, crossover study and received tiotropium 18 mg q.d., formoterol 12 mg b.i.d. or both combined q.d. for three 6-week periods. The end-points were 24-h spirometry (FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC)) at the end of each treatment, rescue salbutamol and safety.Compared with baseline (FEV1 prior to the first dose in the first period), tiotropium produced a significantly greater improvement in average daytime FEV1 (0-12 h) than formoterol (127 versus 86 mL), while average night-time FEV1 (12-24 h) was not different (tiotropium 43 mL, formoterol 38 mL). The most pronounced effects were provided by combination therapy (daytime 234 mL, night-time 86 mL); both differed significantly from single-agent therapies. Changes in FVC mirrored the FEV1 results. Compared with both single agents, daytime salbutamol use was significantly lower during combination therapy (tiotropium plus formoterol 1.81 puffs?day -1 , tiotropium 2.41 puffs?day -1 , formoterol 2.37 puffs?day -1 ). All treatments were well tolerated.In conclusion, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, tiotropium q.d. achieved a greater improvement in daytime and comparable improvement in night-time lung function compared with formoterol b.i.d. A combination of both drugs q.d. was most effective and provided an additive effect throughout the 24-h dosing interval.

Tiotropium 5 microg Respimat SMI is comparable with tiotropium 18 microg HandiHaler in terms of efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety. Respimat SMI is an effective alternative, multi-dose delivery device for tiotropium.

The aim of the study was to characterize pharmacokinetics of tiotropium solution 5 µg compared to powder 18 µg and assess dose-dependency of tiotropium solution pharmacodynamics in comparison to placebo. In total 154 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were included in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind within-solution (1.25, 2.5, 5 µg, and placebo), and open-label powder 18 µg, crossover study, including 4-week treatment periods. Primary end points were peak plasma concentration (Cmax,ss), and area under the plasma concentration–time profile (AUC0–6h,ss), both at steady state. The pharmacodynamic response was assessed by serial spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity). Safety was evaluated as adverse events and by electrocardiogram/Holter. Tiotropium was rapidly absorbed with a median tmax,ss of 5–7 minutes postdosing for both devices. The gMean ratio of solution 5 µg over powder 18 µg was 81% (90% confidence interval, 73–89%) for Cmax,ss and 76% (70–82%) for AUC0–6h,ss, indicating that bioequivalence was not established. Dose ordering for bronchodilation was observed. Powder 18 µg and solution 5 µg were most effective, providing comparable bronchodilation. All treatments were well tolerated with no apparent relation to dose or device. Comparable bronchodilator efficacy to powder18 µg at lower systemic exposure supports tiotropium solution 5 µg for maintenance treatment of COPD.