Rural irrigation could be challenging in regions without proper access to electricity. In many remote places of Nepal, where the irrigation takes place in the vicinity of a river stream, a river water pump or coil pump can be used to supply water from the lower river terrain to the field. Water powered coil pump is a reciprocating pump that operates by rotating a coiled tube, by harnessing the power of a flowing river. A comparison in performance of cylindrical and conical shaped coil pumps was done both experimentally as well as numerically in this work. Under the river velocity of 0.9m/s, the maximum discharge at zero lift condition for the conical pump was 11,500 liters/day while for the cylindrical pump it was 8,600 liters/day. However, the conical pump could not generate lift more than 6.5m while the cylindrical pump performed well even at 11m head. The Numerical study was also carried out in order to visualize the flow patterns and compare the performance of the pumps while varying different parameters. The 3D computation domain of the pump for four cases (two cases varying the number of turns and two cases with change in shape) were generated and numerically studied using OpenFOAM. The interaction, being a multiphase case, interFoam solver was used, and to simplify the simulation laminar turbulence model was taken. The pressure and water volume at the outlet in the simulation were measured and compared between different cases. It was observed that the pressure obtained while using a cylindrical pump was 2.52 % more than that while using the conical pump. The outlet pressure was found to be increasing by 35% while increasing the number of turns from 7 to 15 in cylindrical and 42.5% in case of conical coil pump. The volume flow rate was observed to be more frequent in the case of the conical pump. Due to constraints of computational conditions, the experimental setup could not be totally replicated. However, the outcome showed a similar trend as obtained in the experiment. It was found that the cylindrical pump was better for the higher head, whereas the conical pump had shown better results for higher discharge.
In the hydropower plants exposed to excessive sediment concentration, the components of Francis turbines, especially the regions of Guide Vanes (GVs) and Runner Vanes (RVs) are severely eroded. The side-wall clearance between GV and runner is present in these turbines to separate the rotating and stationary components. The height difference between the runner inlet and GV outlet covers, introduced during the fabrication or assembly process might play a crucial role in accelerating the erosion process in these components. This study is focused on numerical analysis of simplified geometries that replicate different scenarios of the height difference and consequent flow behaviour in the side-wall clearance of Francis turbines. The numerical analysis is done in OpenFOAM using the available solver adopting the finite volume method (FVM). The numerical study is compared with the experimental results obtained from Rotating Disc Apparatus (RDA). The numerical analysis shows the vortex formation in the side-wall clearance region which traps the sediment particles. Such vortex formation causes erosion in the region. The vortex formation and flow behaviour in different height difference scenarios vary with each other and so does the erosion pattern in the experimental results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.