The efficacy of cyclophosphamide (CY) in the treatment of severe systemic vasculitis has been demonstrated, but its optimal administration regimen remains to be defined. The four patients described participated in prospective therapeutic trials of polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) without hepatitis B infection markers, Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) and Wegener's granulomatosis (WG) and received daily oral low-dose CY after failure of a monthly pulse regimen. These patients were included in this study because of failure to induce clinical remission (two patients) and relapse during the course of treatment (two patients). The results were good with initial clinical remission in three patients and stabilization in one. One patient with WG relapsed 10 months after changing therapeutics. The advantages of the different administration protocols are discussed.
Adult, professionally active patients with acute purulent tracheobronchitis were treated with azithromycin (3 or 5 days; n = 62) or clarithromycin (7 to 10 days; n = 69) in an open, randomized study. Bronchitis-related costs and treatment efficacy were assessed at day 5-6 and day 14-21. Both antibiotics were of equal clinical efficacy, although the median time to improvement of symptoms was significantly shorter for azithromycin patients than for clarithromycin patients. Some 77% of azithromycin patients and 78% of clarithromycin patients were unable to work for at least 1 day. The total time when patients were unable to work was shorter for azithromycin patients than for clarithromycin patients, but this difference did not remain significant when weekends and holidays were taken into account. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of azithromycin on time to clinical improvement, on lost working days, and on the associated costs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.