Tolcapone is a potent catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor that prolongs the plasma half-life of levodopa. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study used two 10-hour clinical evaluations to compare the efficacy and safety of three doses of tolcapone (50, 200, and 400 mg tid) with placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations from levodopa/carbidopa. One hundred fifty-one patients completed the study. Clinical evaluations lasting 10 hours were performed on day -1 and day 42 using United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subscale and "on/off" and dyskinesia assessments every 30 minutes. Tolcapone significantly reduced "off" time an average of 40% and increased total "on" time by about 25% at all dose levels, as compared to placebo treatment. Levodopa/carbidopa dosage and frequency were significantly reduced. Tolcapone was well tolerated, with patients experiencing typical dopaminergic side effects that could be reduced or eliminated by lowering levodopa/carbidopa dosages. Tolcapone was effective at prolonging the clinical benefit of levodopa and reducing total levodopa requirements in PD patients with motor fluctuations.
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the effect of the catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor tolcapone 100 or 200 mg three times daily on activities of daily living and motor function in 298 patients with parkinsonism receiving levodopa but without motor fluctuations. At 6 months, both dosages of tolcapone produced significant reductions in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores for activities of daily living (Subscale II) and motor function (Subscale III) and in the total score for Subscales I to III. These improvements were maintained up to the 12-month assessment. At 6 months, both tolcapone groups had changes in levodopa dosage that were significantly different from placebo: the tolcapone groups had decreases in mean total daily dose of levodopa, whereas the placebo group had a mean increase. Tolcapone was well tolerated. The principal adverse events were levodopa-related, but these were generally mild or moderate. Diarrhea was the most frequent nondopaminergic adverse event. Tolcapone appears to be beneficial in the treatment of patients with parkinsonism who have not yet developed motor fluctuations.
Twenty-four parkinsonian patients compared pergolide and bromocriptine therapy in a randomized double-blind, two-period crossover study. Both drugs were adjusted to an optimal balance between benefits and side effects. The mean daily dose and dose range for pergolide and bromocriptine were 3.3 mg (0.7 to 7.2) and 42.7 mg (5.8 to 87.5), respectively. Adjunctive medications, which for most patients included levodopa (plus carbidopa), were not altered during the study. A similar spectrum of clinical effects was found with both drugs and with lisuride, which was used to treat 13 of the patients in a previous study. Despite neurochemical differences in the antiparkinsonian ergots, their clinical utility is quite similar. We draw attention to hepatotoxicity and pleural reactions that may occur rarely with these drugs.
Twenty-eight parkinsonian patients were studied in a double-blind, crossover comparison of lisuride and bromocriptine. All but two patients completed the study, with each drug adjusted to an optimal dose (mean daily intake of 4.5 mg for lisuride and 56.5 mg for bromocriptine). Treatment with each drug was given for 7 to 10 weeks; three assessments were made at biweekly intervals with optimal dose levels. Conventional antiparkinsonian medications, including levodopa, were not changed. Efficacy and adverse effects were assessed by objective and subjective techniques. The only significant difference was slightly better control of akinesia with bromocriptine. There was considerable variability in the optimal dose of each drug, though the clinical profile of lisuride was quite similar to that of bromocriptine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.