Introduction: Screening for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exposure, coupled with engaged decision making to prioritize cancer treatment in parallel with reducing risk of exposure and infection, is crucial in the management of COVID-19 during cancer treatment. After two reported case studies of imaging findings during daily computed tomography (CT)-based image-guided radiotherapy (RT) scans, a call for submission of anonymized case reports was published with the objective of rapidly determining if there was a correlation between the onset of new pulmonary infiltrates found during RT and COVID-19. We hereby report the results of the aggregate analysis.Methods: Data of deidentified case reports for patients who developed biochemically confirmed COVID-19 during RT were submitted through an online portal. Information requested included a patient's sex, age, cancer diagnosis and treatment, and COVID-19 diagnosis and outcome. Coplanar CT-based imaging was requested to reveal the presence or absence of ground-glass opacities or infiltrates.Results: A total of seven reports were submitted from Turkey, Spain, Belgium, Egypt, and the United States.Results and imaging from the patients reported by Suppli et al. and McGinnis et al. were included for a total of nine patients for analysis. All patients were confirmed COVID-19 positive using polymerase chain reaction-based methods or nasopharyngeal swabs. Of the nine patients analyzed, abnormalities consistent with ground-glass opacities or infiltrates were observed in eight patients.Conclusions: This is the largest case series revealing the potential use of CT-based image guidance during RT as a tool for identifying patients who need further workup for COVID-19. Considerations for reviewing image guidance for new pulmonary infiltrates and immediate COVID-19 testing
>50% and unknown in 5, 1 and 1 patients, respectively. There was 1 complete response, 1 partial response, 3 with stable disease, 2 with disease progression. No treatment related toxicities of grade 3 occurred. Conclusion: The trial continues enrollment. Updated results and immunological correlates will be presented at ASTRO.
Background: Despite recent progress in diagnostic and oncology therapy, lung cancer constitutes the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide, with approximately 85% of lung cancer cases being nonesmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histological type. The study of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutational profile in nonesmall cell lung cancer patients has a special clinical significance in the selection of patients for tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency and spectrum of EGFR mutations in a cohort of Moroccan patients with lung cancer using the ADx-ARMS technology. Method: We performed a retrospective study by processing 164 cases of NSCLC patients recruited between March 2015 and March 2018. Using the DNA extracted from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded FFPE tissue, we attempted to identify somatic mutations in exons 18 to 21 of the tyrosine-kinase "TK" domain of EGFR gene. We evaluated EGFR mutations using High Resolution Melt (HRM) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real time PCR "ADx-ARMS technology" for results confirmation. Results: Among the positive mutant cases, the resulting mutations were as follows: 70% of patients have a deletion in exon 19, 10% in exon 21(L858R), 10% in exon 20 (6.7% T790M and 3.3% S768L) and 10% in exon 18 (G719A/C). The EGFR mutations were more frequent among males compared to females (51,7% and 48,3% respectively), all of the positive patients with EGFR mutations were adenocarcinoma (ADK) and 37,9%% of them were smokers. Conclusion: The presented method can be implemented at the laboratories to identify the most frequent EGFR mutations that are important for targeted therapy of advanced lung cancer patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.