Previous studies have shown that expression of the immune co-stimulator B7.1 reduces the tumorigenicity of some, but not all, malignant cell lines. However, B7.1-expressing tumor cells are not very effective in inducing the rejection of established tumors. This may in part be due to induction of anergy in the potentially reactive T cells. Previous studies have shown that IL-2 can reverse the anergic state both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, we have examined the effect of retrovirus-mediated delivery and expression of murine B7.1 and interleukin-2 on tumor formation and rejection of established MHC class I+/II- NC adenocarcinomas. Neither the expression of B7.1 nor IL-2 alone had a significant effect on NC tumorigenicity. In contrast, combined expression of B7.1 and IL-2 substantially decreased the tumorigenicity of these cells in the immunecompetent syngeneic hosts. T-cell depletion studies show this to be dependent primarily on the activation of CD4+ cells. Furthermore, distant subcutaneous injection of irradiated NC/IL-2/B7.1 can induce, much more effectively than NC/B7.1 or NC/IL-2, the rejection of small NC tumors, and prevent the recurrence of large surgically resected tumors. Together, these results suggest that tumor cells genetically modified to express B7.1 and IL-2 can induce the immune-mediated rejection of established class II- tumors by a mechanism involving CD4+ cells.

Summary The recent use of interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interleukin 4 (IL-4) single cytokine modified tumour cells in rodent models has demonstrated a potential use of these cytokines to produce autologous cancer cell vaccines. Here we compare the potential therapeutic benefit of transduction with IL-2 or IL-4 alone, and combined IL-2 + IL-4 in B16F1O cells, a murine malignant melanoma of poor immunogenicity. Transduction of B16F1O cells (MHC class I and II negative) to express either IL-2 or IL-4 alone delays the formation of tumours, IL-4 being more effective than IL-2. However, combined expression of IL-2 + IL4 reduces tumorigenicity more than either cytokine alone. The eventual formation of tumours may result from loss of gene expression, and preliminary results suggest methylation of the retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR), rather than loss of the transduced DNA sequences. Histological examination of tumours expressing either IL-2 or IL-4 alone shows a non-specific inflammatory reaction with an increased tissue infiltrate of immune effectors (monocytes/macrophages, lymphocytes, granulocytes) localised around the tumour. In comparison, when cells expressing combined IL-2 + IL-4 were injected there were more granulocytes present, and perhaps more importantly, these were mainly localised within the tumour. The benefit of combined IL-2 + IL-4 expression results from a local rather than systemic effect as the growth of tumours from cells expressing IL-2 or IL-4 alone injected at distant sites was comparable with a single inoculation of cells expressing either cytokine alone. However, when cells expressing single cytokines IL-2 or IL-4 were mixed and injected at the same site, in comparison with the clonal population of cells expressing combined IL-2 + IL-4, tumour growth was characteristic of IL-4 alone rather than IL-2 + IL-4. Treatment of established tumours with a single injection of lethally irradiated tumour cells expressing IL-2 + IL-4 was sufficient to either reject tumours, or at least delay further tumour development. Furthermore, treatment stimulated an initial non-specific immune reaction that lead to a systemic immunity. Lethally irradiated wild-type cells were also successful in treating some established tumours, although this did not induce any systemic immunity. However, although successful in treatment studies, neither wild-type nor combined IL-2 + IL-4 expressing cells were able to vaccinate animals against a subsequent challenge with live wild-type tumour. These results indicate a potential therapeutic benefit with the use of combination IL-2 + IL-4 transduction of autologous cancer cells.

Summary Engineering of a variety of rodent tumour cells to secrete either interleukin 2 (IL-2), or interleukin 4 (IL-4), has been demonstrated to reduce their tumorigenicity. However the mechanisms of action of secreted IL-2 and IL-4 have not been compared in a single rodent tumour. Here we demonstrate that the weakly immunogenic murine fibrosarcoma FS29 had reduced growth rate and in some cases was rejected by syngeneic animals, when modified to secrete either IL-2 or IL-4, but not IL-5. Immunohistochemical analysis of tumour nodules undergoing regression showed stimulation of a largely lymphocytic infiltrate by IL-2 and a macrophage and granulocyte infiltrate, with a small number of lymphocytes by IL-4. Indeed, secretion of low levels of IL-2 and IL-4 in combination resulted in optimal rejection, suggesting that the two cytokines might mobilise different and complementary effector cell mechanisms. Both IL-2 and IL-4-secreting cells failed to induce the rejection of admixed, unmodified FS29 cells. The loss of cytokine secreting cells from such admixtures occurred more rapidly for IL-2-secreting cells. Injection of IL-4-secreting, but not IL-2-secreting FS29 cells could protect mice from a delayed challenge with unmodified FS29 cells. These data suggest that IL-4 secretion stimulates the better long-term host anti-tumour response.

No abstract