From 1980 to 1982, two investigations of the chronic pollution of roadway runoff water were carried out in areas having different pluviometric characteristics. The runoff from two hundred pluviometric events was characterized using highly rigorous methodologies, with a view to estimating the annual pollution load.
The annual loads were determined; they show that the official instructions hither-to followed were rather pessimistic. On the other hand, greater vigilance is required as regards the loads that may be contributed by an isolated event, but it is not possible to characterize the parameters that will give rise to such an event. A few rain events can introduce into the environment, in a short time, as much as 30% of the annual pollution load of motorway runoff waters.
This paper deals with a comparison of the pollution measurement accuracy between real time pollution sensors (especially Suspended Solids - S.S.- determination by turbidimetry) and standard samples analysis on raw wastewaters. The two methods are used in commonly favourable conditions.
Considering separate measurement errors, the S.S. random errors of the two methods are in the same order of magnitude (about ± 25% for a 90% confidence interval), but sampler/analyses lead to a systematic underevaluation of about 17%. These rather high figures for the sampling/analyses method are due to the cumulation of samples compounding and preservation errors.
The determination of the samples collection error when estimating pollution loads is based on a set of 12 rainfall events registered during a 5 month study on a combined sewer overflow. Due to an optimized sampling strategy, the use of a 24 bottle sampler shows an average S.S. load underevaluation of only 5%, compared with the continuous estimation of the pollution sensor considered as a reference.
Real time pollution sensors can, therefore, be considered as convenient systems for field experiments where particulate pollution is of special interest, which is the case for runoff waters. Besides which, they are particularly suitable for the control and automation of sanitary transport and treatment equipment, being easily integrated into computerized systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.