The prevalence of an abnormal response to the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was examined in 119 in-patients suffering from a major depressive disorder and in 79 normal controls. Only 11 per cent of controls showed an abnormal DST as against 70 per cent of depressed patients. The specificity of the DST was examined by testing patients with other psychiatric disorders. Abnormal responses were found in one-fifth of a sample of schizophrenics, over one-quarter of abstinent alcoholics, two-fifths of neurotics (including neurotic depressives) and almost half of senile dements. Abnormal DST was also found in 33 per cent of patients receiving prophylactic lithium for recurrent affective disorders.

No abstract

Thirty-eight depressed patients who were treated with ECT were randomly assigned to receive lithium therapy or identical-looking placebo tablets for one year after clinical recovery in a double-blind trial. The patients who received placebo tablets spent an average of 7.8 weeks with an episode of depression (either as in-patients or day-patients) during the year. In comparison, patients who received lithium spent on average 1.7 weeks with an episode (P less than 0.02). The trial confirms the high rate of relapses after ECT and suggests that lithium considerably reduces this morbidity. It is suggested that ECT without continuation therapy is not a satisfactory treatment of depressive illness.

1 Plasma levels and platelet 5‐HT uptake characteristics were determined at baseline and at various times during a long‐term study comparing fluvoxamine and lithium prophylaxis. 2 In the fluvoxamine‐ treated patients after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, Km was significantly increased and y, the mean overall uptake, significantly decreased compared to the patients' own baseline values and to lithium treatment. No significant change was noted for Vmax. 3 For fluvoxamine, significant negative relationships were established between the Vmax of platelet 5‐HT uptake and plasma levels. 4 The trial had to be discontinued prematurely for some patients due to apparent lack of efficacy, unwanted effects or a combination of both in the fluvoxamine‐ treated patients. Low plasma levels of fluvoxamine may have contributed to the apparent lack of prophylactic efficacy of the drug. 5 Reference is made to the activity of receptor systems in patients receiving lithium and the consequent changes occurring after the administration of a potent 5‐HT re‐uptake inhibitor.