The diet of the Indian Eagle Owl was studied from April to September 2017 in Tiruchirapalli District, Tamil Nadu, India. Analysis of 1082 regurgitated pellets yielded 2077 prey items; the mean prey items/ pellet was 1.91. The diet constituted 65.1% of rodent prey and the remaining 34.83% of other groups of both vertebrate and invertebrate animals. The mean percentage of prey composition was 31.15% Millardia meltada Soft-furred Field Rat, 12.95% Bandicota bengalensis Lesser Bandicoot Rat, 10.25% Mus booduga Indian Field Mouse, and 10.24% of other rodent species. Of the 34.83% of non-rodent prey, the owls ingested insects (Rhinoceros beetles, 9.58%), Arachnida (Solifugae or Sun spider, Galeodes sp., 9.58%), reptiles (Calotes sp., 3.7%), amphibians (3.56%), shrews (Suncus murinus, 2.84%), and others (5.57%). The Indian Eagle Owls consumed more than one prey per day and chiefly foraged in agricultural crop fields and consumed both small mammals and insects of agricultural importance under crop ecosystems.
Roads have numerous direct and indirect ecological impacts on wildlife. Roads constitute an extensive and integral part of our environment. Collisions with vehicles kill a large number of birds every year. The present study was carried out from January 2016 to December 2016. The data was collected from Nehru Memorial College to Pavithram Lake of Thuraiyur to Namakkal road of Musiri Taluk, Tiruchchirappalli District. During this study, we recorded a total of 64 birds belonging to 12 species killed due to vehicular traffic. A maximum of 11 birds were killed in the months of January and October, and a minimum of two bird kills were observed in the months of September and December. Of the 64 birds, the roadside mortality was observed to the tune of 25%, 20.3%, 14%, 12.5%, 10.9%, 4.6%, and 4.6% for Southern Coucal Centropus parroti, Common Myna Acridotheres tristis, House Crow Corvus splendens, Spotted Owlet Athene brama, Indian Jungle Crow Corvus culminatus, Yellow-billed Babbler Turdoides affinis, and Large Grey Babbler Turdoides malcolmi. Other birds such as Asian Koel Eudynamys scolopaceus, Indian Roller Coracias benghalensis, Shikra Accipiter badius, White-breasted Waterhen Amaurornis phoenicurus, and White-browed Bulbul Pycnonotus luteolus accounted for 1.5% mortality. Suggestive measures to prevent wildlife loss due to vehicular traffic are presented in this communication.
An investigation was made to study the relationship between mandible length and body weight in six species of small mammals, which are the chief prey base of the Barn Owl Tyto alba. Regression equations for four species of rodent pests, B. bengalensis, M. meltada, T. indica and R. rattus are given for the quantification of prey biomass by using mandible length as a function of body weight. The prey biomass for S. murinus (40g) and M. booduga (12g) can be estimated by using mean body weight values. KEYWORDSBarn Owl, Bandicota bengalensis, body weight, mandible length, Millardia meltada, Mus booduga, prey biomass, Rattus rattus, small mammals, Suncus murinus, Tatera indica, Tyto alba Owls are in general highly beneficial birds of prey to mankind since they are rodent hunters. They hunt rodents at night and help to keep in check the populations of these mammals. Among the owls, Barn Owls have global distribution matched by few other species in the world (Burton, 1984;Taylor, 1994), with 36 subspecies distributed throughout the world (Taylor, 1994). In the Indian subcontinent there are two known subspecies, Tyto alba stertens in peninsular India and Tyto alba de-roepstroffi, a rare subspecies restricted to the southern Andaman Islands of the Indian Ocean (Bunn et al., 1982;Ali & Ripley, 1983;Taylor, 1994).The literature reviews on major diet of barn owls from six continents were reported to be rodents, the most important small mammalian group. Out of 52 key studies, analysed on Barn Owls diet by Taylor (1994), the rodents constituted more than 50% of all prey items in 47 studies and they formed more than 75% of all prey items by number in 33 studies, suggesting thereby that Barn Owls are excellent rodent hunters in nature.The results of average daily food requirements of Barn Owls under wild conditions have shown that in two studies, they required more than 75g prey/day (Taylor, 1994;Kanakasabai et al., 1998); and in one study their requirements were more than 100g/day, indicating that Barn Owls are potential rodent eaters in nature.The predatory pressure of Barn Owls over different prey spectrum was studied by an indirect method, namely, the regurgitated pellet analysis, which is a reliable technique than other techniques as far as owls are concerned (Errington, 1932;Glading et al., 1943) and particularly for Barn Owls (Marti, 1987). The pH of the Barn Owls stomach is higher (less acidic) than that of many other predatory birds and hence most of the bones of ingested prey are left undigested (Smith & Richmond, 1972). Further, the skulls and mandibles of even the most delicate small mammal and bird prey are found intact in the pellets and can easily be identified (Taylor, 1994).According to Marti (1987), both prey frequency and biomass quantification methods are equally valuable because the former provides better information on the relative impact of a raptor upon various prey species, while the latter may give a more accurate evaluation of the relative importance of different prey species in the diet.The p...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.