The physicochemical and sensory evaluation of bread from the composite of wheat, water yam and soybean flours were determined. Five bread samples were produced from the proportion of wheat/water yam/soybean flours as 80%:10%:10% (B), 75%:15%:10% (C), 70%:20%:10% (D), 65%:25%10% (E) and 100% wheat was the control sample (A). The moisture, crude protein, fiber and ash increased (p≤0.05) significantly while the carbohydrate and fat content decreased (p≤0.05) significantly with corresponding increase in the percentage of the composite flour from 10-25% for water yam flour at constant 10% soybean level. The result of the physical properties showed that there was a significant difference in all the physical parameters except loaf weight which didn't increased (p≥0.05) significantly with increased addition of water yam flour at constant soybean level. The result of the sensory analysis showed there were significant differences in all the sensory scores. However, consumers preferred the bread from the composite flours of 20% substitution for both water yam and soybean flours. Ochelle et al.; AFSJ, 10(3): 1-8, 2019; Article no.AFSJ.50240 2 Keywords: Wheat; water yam and soybean flours; proximate; physical and sensory attributes. Original Research Article Peer-review history:The peer review history for this paper can be accessed here:

Aims: The aim was to evaluate the effect of watermelon rind addition on chemical and sensory properties of sorghum based mumu. Study Design: The experimental design used was the complete randomized design (CRD) and the Data obtained was subjected to Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s Least Significant Difference(LSD) test to compare treatment means; differences was considered significant at 95% (P≤0.05) (SPSS Version 21 software). Place and Duration of Study: Department of Chemistry, Benue State University, Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria, between June 2018 and March 2019. Methodology: Sorghum-based mumu was prepared from composite flours of 85:15, 75:15, 70:15 and 65:15% roasted sorghum flour and roasted partially defatted groundnut flour respectively and included with 0, 10, 15 and 20% watermelon rind powder respectively which were known as sample A, B, C and D accordingly and sample A was used as control. Subsequently, proximate composition, selected minerals and vitamins were determined using standard methods. Sensory evaluation was also conducted. Results: The addition of watermelon rind powder to sorghum-based mumu showed a significantly higher (P < 0.05) on the protein, ash and fibre. Their values ranged from  13.67 to 15.97%, 1.99 to 3.17% and 1.33 to 1.67% respectively, while moisture, crude fat and carbohydrate decrease with values ranged from 12.35 to 10.70%, 2.07 to 1.94% and 68.59 to 66.55% respectively. The energy values ranged from 347 to 348.76 Kcal/100 g). The results obtained from different minerals tested ranged as follows for phosphorus (124.10 to 155.67mg/100g), for magnesium (1.36 to 2.90 mg/100 g), for calcium (12.28 to26.67 mg/100 g) and for potassium (59.29 to 72.79 mg/100 g). Vitamins ranged from A (14.93 to 15.25 ug/100 g), C (5.97 to 8.12mg/100g), B1 (0.43 to 0.54mg/100g) and B2 (0.01 to 0.13 mg/100 g). Sensory evaluation results showed that the acceptability of the samples decreased significantly (P < 0.05) with increased level of watermelon rind powder. Conclusion: The sorghum -based mumu supplemented with watermelon powder at 10% and 15% should be adopted since their sensory scores were high and the nutrient content significantly increased.

In vivo glycemic index using maize and kidney bean composite flour was carried out by applying cutoff value of greater than seventy (>70) to denote a high glycemic foods, 55-69 indicating medium glycemic foods and (<55) and below indicating low glycemic foods. Maize and kidney bean flours were obtained using the ratios A= (100 maize flour as control), B= (90 MF and 10% KBF), C= (85 % MF and 15% KBF), D= (80% MF and 20% KBF) and E= (75 % MF and 25% KBF). Products were analyzed for glycemic index using albino rats, full Amino acid profile, mineral and vitamin analysis. The glycemic analysis showed a decreased in the fortified samples against the control as the level of kidney bean flour substitution increased over time. There was also a considerable increase in the chemical analysis as the level of kidney bean flour increased. The chemical analysis showed increment in their respective ratios as the level of substitution increased. Results reviewed the problem of poor malnutrition in developing countries and provide a balanced meal. Practical Application Glycemic index (GI) is a measure of the blood glucose-raising potential of a carbohydrate-containing food after it is eaten. Substitution of kidney beans with maize flour can be used to improve the nutrient composition, blood glucose level for diabetic patients and other quality attribute as the fortified samples showed a positive effect on the reduction of blood glucose level. The results of the study also showed maize and kidney bean flours will help to reduce incidences of protein energy malnutrition in the world especially in developing countries.

The functional, physicochemical and sensory evaluation of bread from wheat and garden peas flours were investigated. Five (5) bread samples were produced from the proportion of wheat and garden pea flours as 90%:10% (B), 80%:20% (C), 70%:30% (D), 60%:40% (E) and 100% wheat was the control sample (A) using standard methods. All the functional parameters differed (p≤0.05) significantly. The moisture, crude protein, crude fat, Ash and crude fiber increased (p≤0.05) significantly while the carbohydrate content decrease (p≤0.05) significantly with corresponding increase in the percentage of the composite flour from 10-40%. The result of the physical properties showed that there was a significant difference in all the physical parameters. Also, sensory results showed that there were significant differences in all the sensory scores. However, consumers preferred the bread from 100% wheat flour and 90% and 10% (Sample B) of wheat and garden peas flours substitution.