In 2018, Kīlauea Volcano experienced its largest lower East Rift Zone (LERZ) eruption and caldera collapse in at least 200 years. After collapse of the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō vent on 30 April, magma propagated downrift. Eruptive fissures opened in the LERZ on 3 May, eventually extending ~6.8 kilometers. A 4 May earthquake [moment magnitude (Mw) 6.9] produced ~5 meters of fault slip. Lava erupted at rates exceeding 100 cubic meters per second, eventually covering 35.5 square kilometers. The summit magma system partially drained, producing minor explosions and near-daily collapses releasing energy equivalent toMw4.7 to 5.4 earthquakes. Activity declined rapidly on 4 August. Summit collapse and lava flow volume estimates are roughly equivalent—about 0.8 cubic kilometers. Careful historical observation and monitoring of Kīlauea enabled successful forecasting of hazardous events.
Laboratory studies of large-scale simulated faults show that physical properties of the fault, specifically normal stress and fault roughness, significantly influence the unstable shear failure behavior of the fault. In addition, the experiments provide insights into important length-scaling effects that are useful for assessing concepts such as critical crack length or rupture nucleation dimension. Stick-slip shear failures have been generated along a 2-m-long simulated fault in a block of Sierra white granite. Experiments were conducted at normal stresses between 0.6 and 4 MPa with two different prepared roughnesses of the simulated fault: a smooth fault with a profilometer measured roughness of 0.2 #m and a rough fault with a measured roughness of •80 #m. High-speed records of shear strains and slip velocities clearly show both the propagation of the stick-slip failures and details of the local deformations and motions from which slip weakening of the fault at the onset of sliding can be resolved. Both the dynamic stress drops of the stick-slip events and the apparent fracture energies of the events determined from the records of the fault slip weakening increase with increasing normal stress. Although critical slipweakening displacements are insensitive to normal stress, they increase with increased fault roughness such that the apparent fracture energies are also larger on the rough fault than on the smooth fault. Slip velocities in these experiments are influenced by roughness and are proportional to stress drop. Although the onset of slip is sharply defined, the termination of slip is more gradual without a clear stopping phase. Measured rupture velocities on the rough fault are lower than those on the smooth fault. When a length scale based on rupture nucleation dimensions, directly proportional to critical displacements, is introduced, the data suggest that at fault lengths close to the nucleation lengths, rupture velocity and slip velocity increase with increasing fault length.
Stress changes in the Earth's crust are generally estimated from model calculations that use near-surface deformation as an observational constraint. But the widespread correlation of changes of earthquake activity with stress has led to suggestions that stress changes might be calculated from earthquake occurrence rates obtained from seismicity catalogues. Although this possibility has considerable appeal, because seismicity data are routinely collected and have good spatial and temporal resolution, the method has not yet proven successful, owing to the non-linearity of earthquake rate changes with respect to both stress and time. Here, however, we present two methods for inverting earthquake rate data to infer stress changes, using a formulation for the stress- and time-dependence of earthquake rates. Application of these methods at Kilauea volcano, in Hawaii, yields good agreement with independent estimates, indicating that earthquake rates can provide a practical remote-sensing stress meter.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.