Severe von Willebrand disease is characterized by undetectable or trace quantities of von Willebrand factor in plasma and tissue stores. We have studied the genomic DNA of 10 affected individuals from six families with this disorder using probes from the 5' and 3' ends of the vWF cDNA and with a probe extending from the 5' end into the central region. Southern blots of restriction endonuclease digests and gene dosage analysis measurements carried out with quantitative slot blots of undigested genomic DNA separated these patients into three groups. The first group consisted of a family with complete homozygous deletions of the vWF gene in the four probands. Gene dosage analysis was consistent with heterozygous deletions in both of the asymptomatic parents and four asymptomatic siblings of this kindred (P less than 0.01). The second group was comprised of a family in which there was a complete heterozygous deletion of the vWF gene in the proband and one asymptomatic parent, suggesting that a different type of genetic abnormality was inherited from the other parent. Thus, the patient appeared to be doubly heterozygous for interacting genetic abnormalities affecting vWF expression. In the third group, no gene deletions could be detected. Alloantibodies developed only in the kindred with homozygous deletions. These techniques should prove useful in identifying carriers of severe von Willebrand disease and also in defining patients predictably at risk of developing alloantibodies to vWF.
Summary. 1‐deamino‐8‐D‐arginine‐vasopressin (DDAVP), was used in a wide spectrum of clinical situations employing two different dosages (0.3 and 0.4 μg/kg b. w.) for the management of 43 patients with factor VIII deficiences–mild and moderate haemophilia A and von Willebrand's disease (vWD). In most instances, the drug was given in association with antifibrinolytics. Twenty‐five dental extractions were carried out with two different protocols: one based upon a single infusion and the other based upon three infusions. Bleeding occurred in three patients regardless of the protocol used. The vasopressin analogue promptly stopped bleeding in 12 ‘spontaneous’ open bleeds (haematuria, epistaxis, menometrorrhagia, gum bleeding) and it appears to be also effective in closed bleeds. DDAVP was used to minimize blood loss during surgical interventions and to avoid haemorrhage in the postoperative period. Nine surgical procedures were carried out in six vWD patients and three haemophiliacs. Bleeding occurred late in the postoperative period on one occasion only. No difference was demonstrated between the two doses of the drug either in terms of clinical benefit or rise of factor VIII coagulant activity. The efficacy of DDAVP and the absence of side‐effects make this vasopressin analogue worthy of consideration as a reliable alternative to factor VIII concentrates in a wide variety of clinical situations.
We report our experience with polyelectrolyte-fractionated highly purified porcine factor VIII concentrate (Hyate:C). Porcine factor VIII concentrate was used to treat 14 haemorrhagic episodes including seven severe haemarthroses, three severe haematomata, two episodes of oral bleeding, one traumatic and the other after multiple dental extractions and two life-threatening intestinal haemorrhages. Altogether 60 infusions of Hyate:C were given to five haemophiliacs with inhibitors. At the time of the first infusion with porcine factor VIII the anti-human inhibitor level ranged from 60 to 2.5 modified Bethesda units/ml (MBU 4 h incubation). The porcine cross-reactivity of these inhibitors was 25.6% and 5.4% of the human inhibitor level in two patients and scarcely measurable in the other three patients. We injected an amount of porcine factor VIII concentrate corresponding to the calculated porcine neutralizing units plus the units required for haemostasis. The clinical efficacy was excellent and no adverse effects were encountered, apart from two episodes of mild pyrogenic reactions well controlled by hydrocortisone. The anamnestic antibody response against human factor VIII was of slight degree in all cases, while the porcine cross-reactivity showed no significant variation. Our results emphasize the role of porcine factor VIII in the treatment of haemophiliacs with inhibitors.
Severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (activity < 10%) is pathognomonic of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. ADAMTS13 testing is time-consuming and unavailable in many hospitals. Recently, a seven-variables score named PLASMIC score, has been developed to stratify acute patients, based on their risk of having a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. We present the application of this score in a cohort of patients referred to our Center. From 2012 to 2017, 42 patients with suspected thrombotic microangiopathies from 6 Centers were referred to Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center of "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza" Hospital/Research Institute for ADAMTS13 testing. For all patients, relevant medical and laboratory information were collected. To obtain the statistical measure of the discriminatory power of PLASMIC scoring system, the Area Under the Curve Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC ROC) was calculated. We were able to calculate the PLASMIC score in 27 out of 42 patients; we found a good discrimination performance of the score with a resulting AUC value of 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-1.0; p = 0.015). All patients but one with a high risk PLASMIC score (6-7) showed a severe deficiency. Among patients belonging to the intermediate risk (PLASMIC score 5) group, 2 showed normal ADAMTS13 activity and 2 levels below 10%. In none of the patients in the low risk group (PLASMIC score 0-4), a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency was found. Present results confirm and extend previous data regarding the predictive value of the PLASMIC score. Indeed, it shows a good diagnostic performance and can be useful for decision makers to properly and promptly define the better therapeutic approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.