No abstract

A sample of 171 benzodiazepine (bzd) users was investigated in the pharmacy where the patients filled in their prescriptions. Of the sample, 29.8% were males and 70.2% were females. About 60% of the patients had their current prescription from a general practitioner, the rest from different specialists. 70.8% stated to take bzds on more than 3 days of the week. The mean duration of intake of the entire sample was 4.5 years. The most frequent reasons for bzd intake were sleep disturbance followed by nervousness and somatic diseases. A total of 74.9% of the patients turned out to be well informed about the potential dependence hazards of bzd long term intake, but less than half of them had been informed by the prescribing physician. In a second step it could be demonstrated by means of multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis that certain characteristic parameters differentiate long-term users and persons with signs of potential abuse and dependence from other bzd users.

The authors investigated the clozapine plasma levels of 148 psychiatric inpatients. Multiple regression analysis revealed a linear relationship between dose of clozapine and plasma concentrations. The analysis showed a significant influence of dose, sex, smoking, weight, and age on the plasma concentrations of clozapine under clinical conditions. These results remained significant when clozapine doses below 150 mg/day and above 500 mg/day were excluded from the analysis.

No abstract

Akathisia usually consists of two components, subjective restlessness and typical movements such as shuffling of the legs, pacing, shifting weight from one leg to the other, and rocking movements of the trunk. The ability to measure akathisia reliably is essential for the assessment of treatments for akathisia and for the evaluation of drug-induced side effects in general. To date, investigators have generally used self-constructed assessment scales without reporting data about reliability or validity. The Hillside Akathisia Scale (HAS) has two subjective and three objective items for which anchored rating points are provided. Reliability was 0.89 for the HAS total score. Reliability for rating subjective symptoms ranged from 0.86 to 0.92, and the objective scores ranged from 0.51 to 0.89. The correlation between HAS and a global assessment of akathisia (modified CGI) was 0.87. These values compare favorably with the original report on the scale indicating that the Hillside Akathisia Scale can validly quantify akathisia with a satisfactory degree of interrater reliability.