Background
Recent guidelines recommended judicious use of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the emergency department (ED) for inflammatory bowel disease. Trends in CT utilization over the last decade, including since the implementation of these guidelines, remain unknown.
Methods
We performed a single-centre, retrospective study between 2009 and 2018 to assess trends in CT utilization within 72 h of an ED encounter. Changes in the annual rates of CT imaging among adults with IBD were estimated by Poisson regression and CT findings by Cochran-Armitage or Cochran-Mantel Haenszel tests.
Results
A total of 3000 abdominal CT studies were performed among 14,783 ED encounters. CT utilization increased annually by 2.7% in Crohn’s disease (CD) (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 4.3; P = 0.0004), 4.2% in ulcerative colitis (UC) (95% CI, 1.7 to 6.7; P = 0.0009) and 6.3% in IBD unclassifiable (95% CI, 2.5 to 10.0; P = 0.0011). Among encounters with gastrointestinal symptoms, 60% with CD and 33% with UC underwent CT imaging in the final year of the study. Urgent CT findings (obstruction, phlegmon, abscess or perforation) and urgent penetrating findings alone (phlegmon, abscess or perforation) comprised 34% and 11% of CD findings, and 25% and 6% of UC findings, respectively. The CT findings remained stable overtime for both CD (P = 0.13) and UC (P = 0.17).
Conclusion
Our study demonstrated persistently high rates of CT utilization among patients with IBD who presented to the ED over the last decade. Approximately one third of scans demonstrated urgent findings, with a minority demonstrating urgent penetrating findings. Future studies should aim to identify patients in whom CT imaging is most appropriate.
Background
Dynamic positional changes during colonoscopy are commonly used in clinical practice, in particular moving from side to side. It has been shown to improve both adenoma detection rates as well as cecal intubation times. However, perhaps due to an additional level of inconvenience, there have been few studies comparing the anatomy and changes in colonic curvature when patients are in the prone position, which may help to prevent anterior bowing of the scope, particularly in patients with high body mass index (BMI).
Aims
To compare both the number of colonic curves and degree of change in curves with patients in supine versus prone positioning during computed tomography colonography (CTC).
Methods
75 CTC studies, obtained between January and April 2017 at Hotel Dieu Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, were screened and included based on image quality and adequacy of distention. Per standardized protocol, all patients undergoing CTC are imaged both in supine and prone positioning. Using an automated computer algorithm process developed for this study, curves were identified and measured via centerline points placed digitally through the colonic lumen, and compared between supine and prone patient positioning.
Results
75 colonographies were examined. The mean age was 68 years and 37/75 were male. BMI data was available for 56 patients, with mean BMI 29.4 (SD 5.7). There were no significant differences in total mean degrees of curvature between supine and prone positions [75.3 (SD 13.5) vs. 77.3 (SD 15.3), p=0.07], nor a significantly higher total number of curves >100 degrees [4.0 (SD 2.0) vs. 4.5 (SD 2.3), p=0.14]. No significant correlation was seen between BMI and change in position (correlation factor 0.2, p=0.13).
Conclusions
No significant differences were found between the two positions during CT colonography. This certainly calls into question the strategy of starting in prone position, even in higher BMI patients. However, CT colonography doesn’t account for changes that can occur during colonoscopy, as the scope itself can dynamically affect angulations within the colon.
Funding Agencies
None
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.