The article systematizes information on the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety disorders, the frequency of which has increased significantly at the present time, in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. The characteristic of stressful factors affecting the human psyche in the conditions of forced self-isolation and after it is given. Many people experience anxiety due to lockdown, social isolation, unemployment, and a high probability of illness and death. Uncertainty in the future, anxiety during the period of uncertainty caused by the spread of the “new coronavirus”, are a trigger for emotional exhaustion, suppress the immune system, which negatively affects the human nervous system and provokes an exacerbation of chronic ailments. The psychological consequences of a person’s stay in quarantine are considered. In the structure of mental health disorders associated with the COVID-19 epidemic, there is a large range of adaptation disorders: fear, frustration, a sense of hopelessness, expectation of threat, loneliness, social isolation and alienation. In the situation of COVID-19, there is often a depletion of mental resources and maladaptation, a disorder of adaptive reactions. Anxiety disorders occur in the form of adaptation disorders, generalized anxiety disorder, somatoform disorders, including panic attacks. Timely diagnosis of these disorders is possible not only by the psychiatric service, but also with the involvement of internists who possess screening diagnostic tools with automated conclusions (scales, mobile applications to smartphones, etc.). A brief review of domestic and foreign studies on the assessment of methods for the diagnosis and treatment of anxiety disorders is presented. Diagnostic methods and therapeutic tactics, the use of various traditional drugs in psychosomatic pathology are discussed. To correct the identified disorders, there is a choice of anti-anxiety drugs, including antidepressants (primarily selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors), tranquilizers, among which tofizopam occupies a worthy place.

Introduction. The relevance of the study is determined by the increase of atypical forms of depression, which is especially characteristic of outpatient affective disorders. In this case, the frequency of occurrence of individual atypical depressive symptoms requires clarification.Aim. To determinate the prevalence of atypical symptoms in patients with depressive disorder.Materials and methods. Patients (87 subjects) with depressive disorder, aged 18–70, who gave inform consent. The selection criterion was the result of psychometric research using The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): the study included patients who scored more than 7 points. Patients with severe organic insufficiency and neurological diseases, alcohol and substance abuse were excluded. The study used clinical psychometric and statistical methods. The main examination tool is stimulus material in the form of a table with a list of atypical depressive symptoms.Results. Based on the psychometric assessment, patients were divided into two groups: patients with subclinical depression included 19 patients, patients with clinically severe depression included 68 patients. Among patients with subclinical depression, increased anxiety (89.5%), mood reactivity (84.2%), hypersonium (78.9%), hyperphagia (73.7%) and somatized symptoms (73.7%) were most often recorded. Among patients with clinically pronounced depression, increased anxiety (91.2%), somatized symptoms (80.9%), hypersonium (79.4%) and inverted daily rhythm (72.1%) were most common.Conclusion. The data obtained confirm the high prevalence of symptoms of atypical depression among patients with depressive spectrum disorders. The frequent occurrence of anxious and somatized symptoms in the structure of depression, as well as hypersomnia, was demonstrated. It seems relevant to further study the prevalence of separate symptoms of atypical depression.

No abstract

No abstract