In the last decade, it has become increasingly clear that necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is neither a uniform nor a well-defined disease entity. There are many factors that are forcing this unwelcome realization upon the neonatal and pediatric surgery communities. In the course of this manuscript we will review the history and the physical findings of the disparate etiologies of acquired neonatal intestinal diseases (ANIDs), some which do lead to the common final pathology of NEC and some which do not. New guidelines for distinguishing between ANIDs will also be suggested. (2007) Keywords: necrotizing enterocolitis; spontaneous intestinal perforation; neonate; intestine; premature; diagnosis A brief history of clinical NEC research in the presurfactant era During the late 1970s, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was most commonly seen in preterm infants >30 weeks of gestation. Journal of Perinatology

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a common gastrointestinal emergency of neonates. Population studies estimate the incidence of NEC at between 0.3 and 2.4 per 1000 live births in the United States, with a predominance of cases among preterm neonates born at the earliest gestational ages. The disease burden of NEC includes an overall disease-specific mortality rate of 15-20%, with yet higher rates in those of earliest gestations. The NEC burden also includes an increase in hospital costs approximating $100,000/case, as well as severe late sequellae including parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease and short bowel syndrome. Differentiating NEC from other forms of acquired neonatal intestinal disease is critical to assessing the success of NEC prevention strategies. Promising new prevention strategies are now being tested; one such is prophylactic heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) administration. However, two prevention strategies have already been shown in meta-analyses to reduce the incidence of NEC, but we speculate that these are not being fully utilized. They are; 1) implementing a written set of feeding guidelines (also called standardized feeding regimens) for newborn intensive care unit (NICU) patients, and 2) implementing programs to increase the availability of human milk for patients at risk of developing NEC.

Objective: To examine whether antenatal steroids (ANS), alone or with early indomethacin, are associated with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). SIP is a known complication of concurrent post-natal administration of glucocorticoid and indomethacin in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.Study design: A large de-identified national data set was retrospectively examined for infants with SIP without any report of other malformation or necrotizing entrocolitis. A control group was then derived matching for gender and birth weight (±20 g). Pre-and post-natal variables were tested by both univariate and multivariate analysis to identify associations with SIP.Results: From January 1996 to June 2004, there were 2 27 711 discharges from Pediatrix neonatal intensive care unit sites. From this population 388 infants with SIP associated with ELBW were compared to matched controls. Infants with SIP were more likely to have received early indomethacin and to have received a combination of early indomethacin with post-natal glucocorticoids (P<0.05 for both). When used alone (without subsequent indomethacin), ANS showed no association with SIP. When used in conjunction with indomethacin, ANS did not increase the rate of SIP beyond indomethacin alone.Conclusion: ELBW Infants that acquire SIP were more likely to have been exposed to early indomethacin and post-natal glucocorticoids. However, no association was found between SIP and ANS within a wellpowered cohort.

A reference range for lymphocytes can identify neonates with abnormal counts, which can be useful because these neonates are at higher risk for certain adverse outcomes.

No abstract