We have prospectively monitored treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors by recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) administered by continuous infusion to obtain more insight in the underlying factors of the clinical efficacy of this administration method. At present, 43 treatment episodes of 14 different Dutch haemophilia inhibitor patients are included in the database. Analysis of the data showed a discrepancy between the efficacy of rFVIIa continuous infusion treatment of acute and surgical bleeds in the oral cavity [one (14%) effective, two (29%) partially effective, four (57%) not effective] and other parts of the body [29 (80%) effective, four (11%) partially effective, two (6%) not effective, one (3%) impossible to classify]. Patients who had acute or surgical oral cavity bleeds, uncontrolled by rFVIIa continuous infusion, reacted favourably to rFVIIa continuous infusion in other locations of the body. Acute bleeding episodes in the oral cavity, which could not be controlled by rFVIIa continuous infusion, stopped when the treatment regimen was switched to rFVIIa bolus injections. Finally, haemostatic control during dental extractions was excellent after the initial rFVIIa bolus injection preceding the continuous infusion, but rebleeds occurred in all patients within 48 h under rFVIIa continuous infusion coverage. These observations suggest that the efficacy of rFVIIa continuous infusion depends, at least in part, on the location of the body in which the bleeding occurs and that rFVIIa bolus injections are more effective than rFVIIa continuous infusion in the oral cavity. We hypothesize that the inability of rFVIIa continuous infusion treatment to sufficiently inhibit fibrinolysis is the underlying cause of the decreased efficacy of rFVIIa continuous infusion treatment in the oral cavity.

No abstract

Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most common inherited bleeding disorder, display large variation in bleeding tendency, which is not completely related to VWF levels. The cause of variability in clinical expression is largely unknown. The effect of plasma fibrinolytic capacity on bleeding tendency in VWD patients has not been investigated. We hypothesized that enhanced fibrinolysis may result in a more severe bleeding phenotype. Therefore, we measured the fibrinolytic potential in patients with moderate or severe VWD to investigate the contribution of fibrinolysis to the bleeding tendency. Fibrinolytic potential was measured as plasma clot lysis time (CLT) with and without addition of potato carboxypeptidase inhibitor (PCI) in 638 patients with moderate or severe VWD who participated in a nationwide multicentre cross-sectional study. Bleeding severity was measured using the Bleeding Score (BS).The CLTs were significantly longer, indicative of hypofibrinolysis, in men compared to women with VWD [106.2 (IQR 95.7-118.1) vs. 101.9 (IQR 92.8-114.0) min]. The CLTs prolonged with increasing age. No association was found between VWF or FVIII levels and CLT, or between VWF or FVIII levels and CLT(+PCI) . No association was observed for BS in a model with 10log-transformed CLT, adjusted for age, gender, VWF:Act and FVIII [b = 6.5 (95%CI -0.3 to 13.4)]. Our study showed that the plasma fibrinolytic potential does not influence bleeding tendency in VWD patients and therefore does not explain the variability in bleeding phenotype in VWD.

Nonafact(®), an ultrapure, monoclonal antibody-purified factor IX concentrate (FIX) was developed to minimize risk of thrombotic complications and viral transmission. To investigate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety, phase III/IV studies were performed in the Netherlands and Poland from 1996 to 2007. The mean half-life, in vivo response and recovery of Nonafact(®) were 18.7 (SD 2.0) h, 1.1 (SD 0.2) IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) b.w. of FIX infused and 49% (SD 10%), respectively. Eleven surgical procedures were performed in eight patients. During two surgeries, both high-risk, blood loss was observed. No postoperative bleeding occurred. The in vivo recovery of FIX was higher than expected. In the phase III follow-up study, 26 previously treated patients (PTP) were included with a median follow-up of 1130 days. From the 1617 minor bleedings, 80.5% was stopped after a single infusion. In the phase IV study thirteen patients were treated for a median study period of 737 days. In the two follow-up studies the investigators rated the effect of Nonafact(®) as excellent/good in 95% of major bleedings. Surgeries for which Nonafact(®) was given prophylactically were without bleeding problems. In total more than 10 million units of Nonafact(®) were used during almost 120 person-years. Only one minor adverse event was reported. No inhibitors, viral transmissions and thrombogenic events occurred. In conclusion, Nonafact(®) is safe and provides excellent haemostasis in haemophilia B patients treated for spontaneous bleeding or undergoing surgical procedures. Due to the excellent in vivo recovery characteristic, treatment with Nonafact(®) is cost saving compared to other FIX products.

No abstract