No abstract

We examined the renal hemodynamic modifications induced by a selective angiotensin II (AII) AT1 receptor antagonist, losartan, in 10 patients with essential hypertension. In this single-blind study, renal hemodynamic parameters were determined twice (patients were their own controls) first after a 15-day single-blind placebo run-in period and again after a 1-month losartan period. The dosage of losartan was 50 mg/day. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR, inulin clearance), renal plasma flow [RPF; para-aminohippurate (PAH) clearance], microalbuminuria, sodium excretion, proximal sodium tubular reabsorption (lithium clearance), and acid uric metabolism were measured. After 1-month losartan treatment, systolic and diastolic BP (SBP, DBP) decreased significantly throughout the 210-min recording whereas heart rate (HR) was unchanged. GFR (100 +/- 19 vs. 96 +/- 17 ml/min/1.73 m2) and RPF (471 +/- 118 vs. 468 +/- 108 ml/ min/1.73 m2) were not altered by losartan. Rather than occurrence of any modification in filtration fraction (FF), a significant decrease in microalbuminuria was evident (57 +/- 77 vs. 40 +/- 59 mg/24 h, p < 0.05). Urinary sodium excretion was not modified, but an almost significant (p = 0.07) decrease in proximal sodium reabsorption was observed (72.9 +/- 7.7 vs. 68.1 +/- 6.4% of filtered sodium). The increase in renal uric clearance accounted for the significant decrease in serum uric acid (195 +/- 49 vs. 183 +/- 43 microM; p < 0.05). After 1-month losartan treatment, renal function was well preserved; the decrease in uric acid may be of clinical interest when adjuvent diuretic therapy is required.

The 1-month reproducibility of haemodynamic and sympathoadrenal responses to a standardized mental stress test was studied in ten normotensive and ten hypertensive individuals. The stress test was a computerized adaptation of the Stroop test and sympathetic activity was evaluated by measuring urinary catecholamine excretion. Three-way analysis of variance (stress, session, blood pressure) revealed significant increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressures and in heart rate during the stress test. Test-retest correlation coefficients for basal stress levels, and stress-induced variations were significant (r from 0.59 to 0.88). The stress test induced a significant increase in urinary noradrenaline excretion with large intra- and interindividual variability. The significant test-retest correlations and the lack of period effect for haemodynamic parameters indicated good temporal stability. However, a slight decrease in stress-induced reactivity was observed. This standardized mental stress test may be useful in epidemiological and therapeutic trials to measure blood pressure and heart rate responses, but measurement of urinary catecholamine excretion does not provide any additional information.

By using a highly specific chromatographic technique, the effect of renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of the six main components of teicoplanin, taken individually or as a whole, was assessed for over 120 h after administration of a 3-mg/kg intravenous dose to healthy volunteers (group 1, n = 6) and to noninfected patients with moderate (group 2, n 6) or severe (group 3, n = 7) renal failure. In subjects with normal renal function, total teicoplanin was mainly excreted in urine and its concentrations in plasma could be adequately fitted to a three-compartment model. Renal failure did not affect the model or the distribution of teicoplanin but strongly decreased its renal clearance (9.3, 3.2, and 0.6 ml/h per kg, respectively, for the three groups of subjects), in close relationship with the creatinine clearance (r = 0.973, n = 18, P < 0.001). The cumulative urinary excretion of unchanged total teicoplanin was decreased (50, 21, and 5% of the given dose for groups I to 3) and the terminal half-life was enhanced -(62, 96, and I11 h for groups 1 to 3) by renal impairment. The relative behavior of the six major components was only slightly affected by renal failure. Consequently, the dosage regimen adjustment could be based on the total teicoplanin concentration, and simulations with the mean estimated pharmacokinetic paanameters suggest that the 6-mg/kg daily dose, known to be effective in patients with normal renal function, could be given every 2 and 3 days in patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency, respectively.

No abstract