Introduction Micro-embolic signals (MESs) detected using transcranial Doppler (TCD) help in risk stratification in stroke patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to estimate the prevalence of MES and its association with stroke recurrence, functional outcome, and mortality in different stroke subtypes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted before 26th January 2021 in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov . Studies were identified that used TCD to detect MES in stroke/TIA patients. Pooled prevalence and odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for different outcome measures. The entire statistical analysis was conducted in R version 3.6.2. Findings Fifty-eight studies involving 5123 patients (1329 MES+, 3794 MES−) were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of MES among all acute stroke/TIA patients was 30% (95% CI 25-34%). The pooled prevalence adjusted after the trim-and-fill analysis among all acute stroke/TIA patients was 18% (95% CI 14-23%). The prevalence of MES was high among all stroke subtypes except in patients with small vessel disease (SVD). In patients with new-onset stroke/TIA, the presence of MES was associated with a high risk of recurrence of cerebral ischemia (OR 4.03; 95% CI 2.38-6.82). Although no significant association was observed for the presence of MES with increased mortality (OR 2.37; 95% CI 0.75-7.50) and poor functional outcome (OR 2.11; 95% CI 0.20-22.50) among patients with new-onset stroke/TIA, this could only be determined in a smaller sample size of 477 patients. Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed a 30% prevalence of MES following acute stroke/TIA. The presence of MES increased the chance of recurrence of cerebral ischemia but was not associated with poor functional outcomes and mortality in the studied subgroup.
Background As the health systems around the world struggled to meet the challenges of COVID-19 pandemic, care of many non-COVID emergencies was affected. Aims The present study examined differences in the diagnosis, evaluation and management of stroke patients during a defined period in the ongoing pandemic in 2020 when compared to a similar epoch in year 2019. Methods The COVID stroke study group (CSSG) India, included 18 stroke centres spread across the country. Data was collected prospectively between February and July 2020 and retrospectively for the same period in 2019. Details of demographics, stroke evaluation, treatment, in-hospital and three months outcomes were collected and compared between these two time points. Results A total of 2549 patients were seen in both study periods; 1237 patients (48.53%) in 2019 and 1312 (51.47%) in 2020. Although the overall number of stroke patients and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, a significant decline was observed in the month of April 2020, during the initial period of the pandemic and lockdown. Endovascular treatment reduced significantly and longer door to needle and CT to needle times were observed in 2020. Although mortality was higher in 2020, proportion of patients with good outcome were similar in both the study periods. Conclusions Although stroke admissions and rates of thrombolysis were comparable, some work flow metrics were delayed, endovascular stroke treatment rates declined and mortality was higher during the pandemic study period. Reorganization of stroke treatment pathways during the pandemic has likely improved the stroke care delivery across the globe.
Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a diverse group of autoantibodies found in various systemic autoimmune disorders. They represent a key diagnostic marker in the diagnosis of connective tissue disorders (CTD). Although many techniques exist, ANA by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF) remains the gold standard for diagnosing CTDs. Neurologists should be aware of the type of assay used for detection and the advantages and disadvantages of using each method. Through this article, we aimed to review the methodological aspects of the detection of ANA and its subtypes and their clinical relevance in various neurologic disorders.
Introduction Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in spite of tremendous advances in medical therapies. Vitamin D deficiency has been increasingly recognised in heart failure and its therapeutic as well as prognostic implications are debated. This study was carried out to examine the relationship of Vitamin D levels with severity of heart failure as assessed by NYHA functional class and serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) levels in vitamin D deficient patients with CHF. Methodology and results In this cross-sectional analysis, 119 patients of symptomatic CHF presenting to the outpatient/inpatient department of cardiology in a tertiary care institute in North India were screened. Patients were categorised according to their functional class as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III, IV and their serum levels of vitamin D and NT-pro-BNP were measured. Out of 119 patients, 107 (90%) were found to have low vitamin D levels which were classified as insufficient (20-30 ng/ml) (n=25, 23%) or deficient (<20 ng/ml) (n=82,77%). The mean NT-pro-BNP levels increased significantly across functional class as 3783±6132 pg/ml, 7866±4383 pg/ml, 21115±11905 pg/ml in NYHA class II, III and IV respectively (p=0.000). The respective mean serum Vitamin D3 levels of 11.6±5.8ng/ml, 12.2±7.9 ng/ml, 14.4±8.9 ng/ml were not significantly different between classes (p=0.234). We found no correlation between serum NT-pro-BNP and serum vitamin D levels in the study cohort across various NYHA classes. In multivariate regression model, after adjusting for various co-variates, vitamin D levels were not significantly associated with NT-pro-BNP or functional class in patients with CHF. Conclusion Patients with CHF have a high prevalence (90%) of vitamin D deficiency. Although NT-pro-BNP levels increase significantly, vitamin D levels do not vary significantly with worsening NYHA classes. Further, no consistent significant correlation of vitamin D deficiency with NT-pro-BNP across different NYHA classes was observed. Thus, low levels of vitamin D didn’t predict the severity and prognosis of patients with heart failure. .
Background and objective Amongst the varied neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection, stroke is one of the common complications. A large portion of patients had large vessel occlusion (LVO) which increases the risk of malignant cerebral infarction requiring decompressive craniectomy. The impact of COVID-19, however, on decompressive craniectomy is not well described. Through this study, we aim to study the impact of decompressive craniectomy in COVID-19 patients presented to our tertiary care hospital. Material and methods Data of all acute ischemic stroke patients who tested COVID positive during the study period was collected. From among them, patients requiring decompressive craniectomy were included. The demographic, clinico-radiological parameters related to stroke, treatment received, outcome and complications were noted. In addition, data from all case reports and case series published on patients with COVID-19, who had developed ischemic stroke and underwent decompression craniectomy was collected and systematically reviewed. Results Twenty-seven stroke patients tested positive for COVID-19 infection, out of whom five patients underwent decompression hemicraniectomy in view of neurologic deterioration. The review of literature yielded 453 abstracts. After reading the full text of 69 articles, 12 studies on 15 patients finally met our inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The mortality rate was 40% among stroke patients requiring decompressive craniectomy in COVID-19 patients. The mortality rate and functional outcomes of this cohort are comparable to the pre-pandemic period. Conclusion Decompressive craniectomy is a life-saving procedure in COVID-19 patients with malignant infarctions similar to patients in the pre-COVID-19 era.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.