Study design Longitudinal, randomized study. Objectives (1) Test the safety and feasibility of a ketogenic diet (KD) intervention in the acute stages of spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) assess the effects of a KD on neurological recovery, and (3) identify potential serum biomarkers associated with KD-induced changes in neurological recovery. Setting Acute care and rehabilitation facility. Methods The KD is a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet that includes ≈70-80% total energy as fat. Seven participants with acute complete and incomplete SCI (AIS A-D) were randomly assigned to KD (n = 4) or standard diet (SD, n = 3). Neurological examinations, resting energy expenditure analysis, and collection of blood for evaluation of circulating ketone levels were performed within 72 h of injury and before discharge. Untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed on serum samples to identify potential serum biomarkers that may explain differential responses between groups.Results Our pilot findings primarily demonstrated that KD is safe and feasible to be administered in acute SCI. Furthermore, upper extremity motor scores were higher (p < 0.05) in the KD vs. SD group and an anti-inflammatory lysophospholipid, lysoPC 16:0, was present at higher levels, and an inflammatory blood protein, fibrinogen, was present at lower levels in the KD serum samples vs. SD serum samples. Conclusion Taken together, these preliminary results suggest that a KD may have anti-inflammatory effects that may promote neuroprotection, resulting in improved neurological recovery in SCI. Future studies with larger sample size are warranted for demonstrating efficacy of KD for improving neurological recovery.
BACKGROUND Helicopters are widely used to facilitate the transport of trauma patients, from the scene of an incident to the hospital. However, the use of helicopters may not always be appropriate. The aim of this project was to conduct a geospatial analysis of helicopter transport to a Level I trauma center. METHODS Retrospective geospatial analysis of trauma registry data, 2013 to 2018. We included all adult (≥16) trauma patients brought to the trauma center directly from the scene. Data were geocoded and analyzed using arcGIS. Drive times and flight times were calculated using Google Maps. Flight times included the time required to reach the incident location. RESULTS Two thousand eight hundred ninety-three patients were identified, and 1,911 had incident locations recorded and were therefore included in the analysis. The median age was 41 years (interquartile range [IQR], 27–58 years). Twenty-four percent of the patients had suffered severe injuries (Injury Severity Score [ISS], 16–25), 17% very severe injuries (ISS > 25), 24% moderately severe injuries, and 36% minor injuries (ISS, 1–8). The overall geographical distribution was centroidal, although with a concentration of case volume in the vicinity, and to the northeast, of the trauma center. Median flight time was 60 minutes (IQR, 52–69 minutes), and median drive time 65 minutes (IQR, 54–86 minutes). In 33% of the patients, the calculated drive time to the trauma center was shorter than the calculated flight time when considering the time for the helicopter to reach the scene. CONCLUSION The majority of patients taken to our level I trauma center by helicopter are injured in relatively close proximity. One in four patients is severely or very severely injured, but one third of the patients have only minor injuries. Over a quarter of trauma patients might have reached hospital more quickly if they had been taken by road, rather than helicopter. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological/geographical study, level V.
Trauma is a time-critical condition. Helicopters are thought to enhance the accessibility to trauma centers, but this benefit is poorly quantified. The aim of this study was to conduct a geographical analysis of the added benefit provided by helicopters, over ground transport. This study uses geospatial analysis. Helicopter bases and Level I and II designated trauma centers were geocoded. 60-minute drive-time and elliptical flight-time isochrones were mapped with ArcGIS™ (Esri, Redlands, CA). Calculations included allowance for mission ground time (MGT). We compared the proportion of the population that could be taken to Level I and II trauma centers, within 60 minutes, by road and by air. Using a 30-minute MGT model, helicopters permit 279,317 additional residents (5.8%) access to a Level I trauma center within 60 minutes. Using the 20-minute MGT model, 1,089,177 more residents (22.8%) would have access to Level I trauma center care. The benefits were marginally greater for access to Level I and II trauma center care. Helicopters enhance access to specialist trauma center care, but the benefit is small and dependent on MGT. Consideration should be given to the siting of helicopters, particularly in relation to trauma patients, MGT, and the timely response of EMS when determining the triage for helicopter transport.
INTRODUCTION:Community consultation (CC) is a key step for exception from informed consent research. Using social media to conduct CC is becoming more widely accepted but has largely been conducted by single sites. We describe our experience of a social mediabased CC for a multicenter clinical trial, coordinated by the lead clinical site. METHODS:Multicenter CC was administered by the lead site and conducted in preparation for a three-site prehospital randomized clinical trial.We used Facebook and Instagram advertisements targeted to the population of interest. When "clicked," the advertisements directed individuals to study-specific websites, providing additional information and the opportunity to opt out. The lead institution and one other hospital relied on a single website, whereas the third center set up their own website. Site views were evaluated using Google analytics. RESULTS:The CC took 8 weeks to complete for each site. The advertisements were displayed 9.8 million times, reaching 332,081 individuals, of whom 1,576 viewed one of the study-specific websites. There were no requests to opt out.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.