The continuously growing mouse incisor is an excellent model to analyze the mechanisms for stem cell lineage. We designed an organ culture method for the apical end of the incisor and analyzed the epithelial cell lineage by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine and DiI labeling. Our results indicate that stem cells reside in the cervical loop epithelium consisting of a central core of stellate reticulum cells surrounded by a layer of basal epithelial cells, and that they give rise to transit-amplifying progeny differentiating into enamel forming ameloblasts. We identified slowly dividing cells among the Notch1-expressing stellate reticulum cells in specific locations near the basal epithelial cells expressing lunatic fringe, a secretory molecule modulating Notch signaling. It is known from tissue recombination studies that in the mouse incisor the mesenchyme regulates the continuous growth of epithelium. Expression of Fgf-3 and Fgf-10 were restricted to the mesenchyme underlying the basal epithelial cells and the transit-amplifying cells expressing their receptors Fgfr1b and Fgfr2b. When FGF-10 protein was applied with beads on the cultured cervical loop epithelium it stimulated cell proliferation as well as expression of lunatic fringe. We present a model in which FGF signaling from the mesenchyme regulates the Notch pathway in dental epithelial stem cells via stimulation of lunatic fringe expression and, thereby, has a central role in coupling the mitogenesis and fate decision of stem cells.

Interactions between FGF10 and the IIIb isoform of FGFR-2 appear to be crucial for the induction and growth of several organs, particularly those that involve budding morphogenesis. We determined their expression patterns in the inner ear and analyzed the inner ear phenotype of mice specifically deleted for the IIIb isoform of FGFR-2. FGF10 and FGFR-2(IIIb) mRNAs showed distinct, largely nonoverlapping expression patterns in the undifferentiated otic epithelium. Subsequently, FGF10 mRNA became confined to the presumptive cochlear and vestibular sensory epithelia and to the neuronal precursors and neurons. FGFR-2(IIIb) mRNA was expressed in the nonsensory epithelium of the otocyst that gives rise to structures such as the endolymphatic and semicircular ducts. These data suggest that in contrast to mesenchymal-epithelial-based FGF10 signaling demonstrated for other organs, the inner ear seems to depend on paracrine signals that operate within the epithelium. Expression of FGF10 mRNA partly overlapped with FGF3 mRNA in the sensory regions, suggesting that they may form parallel signaling pathways within the otic epithelium. In addition, hindbrain-derived FGF3 might regulate otocyst morphogenesis through FGFR-2(IIIb). Targeted deletion of FGFR-2(IIIb) resulted in severe dysgenesis of the cochleovestibular membraneous labyrinth, caused by a failure in morphogenesis at the otocyst stage. In addition to the nonsensory epithelium, sensory patches and the cochleovestibular ganglion remained at a rudimentary stage. Our findings provide genetic evidence that signaling by FGFR-2(IIIb) is critical for the morphological development of the inner ear.

The morphogenesis and cell differentiation in developing teeth is governed by interactions between the oral epithelium and neural crest‐derived ectomesenchyme. The fibroblast growth factors FGF‐4, ‐8, and ‐9 have been implicated as epithelial signals regulating mesenchymal gene expression and cell proliferation during tooth initiation and later during epithelial folding morphogenesis and the establishment of tooth shape. To further evaluate the roles of FGFs in tooth development, we analyzed the roles of FGF‐3, FGF‐7, and FGF‐10 in developing mouse teeth. In situ hybridization analysis showed developmentally regulated expression during tooth formation for Fgf‐3 and Fgf‐10 that was mainly restricted to the dental papilla mesenchymal cells. Fgf‐7 transcripts were restricted to the developing bone surrounding the developing tooth germ. Fgf‐10 expression was observed in the presumptive dental epithelium and mesenchyme during tooth initiation, whereas Fgf‐3 expression appeared in the dental mesenchyme at the late bud stage. During the cap and bell stage, both Fgf‐3 and Fgf‐10 were intensely expressed in the dental papilla mesenchymal cells both in incisors and molars. It is of interest that Fgf‐3 expression was also observed in the primary enamel knot, a putative signaling center of the tooth, whereas no transcripts were seen in the secondary enamel knots that appear in the tips of future cusps of the bell stage tooth germs. Down‐regulation of Fgf‐3 and Fgf‐10 expression in postmitotic odontoblasts correlated with the terminal differentiation of the odontoblasts and the neighboring ameloblasts. In the incisors, mesenchymal cells of the cervical loop area showed partially overlapping expression patterns for all studied Fgfs. In vitro analyses showed that expression of Fgf‐3 and Fgf‐10 in the dental mesenchyme was dependent on dental epithelium and that epithelially expressed FGFs, FGF‐4 and ‐8 induced Fgf‐3 but not Fgf‐10 expression in the isolated dental mesenchyme. Beads soaked in Shh, BMP‐2, and TGF‐β1 protein did not induce either Fgf‐3 or Fgf‐10 expression. Cells expressing Wnt‐6 did not induce Fgf‐10 expression. Furthermore, FGF‐10 protein stimulated cell proliferation in the dental epithelium but not in the mesenchyme. These results suggest that FGF‐3 and FGF‐10 have redundant functions as mesenchymal signals regulating epithelial morphogenesis of the tooth and that their expressions appear to be differentially regulated. In addition, FGF‐3 may participate in signaling functions of the primary enamel knot. The dynamic expression patterns of different Fgfs in dental epithelium and mesenchyme and their interactions suggest existence of regulatory signaling cascades between epithelial and mesenchymal FGFs during tooth development. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

To elucidate the roles of fibroblast growth factors (FGF) in the regulation of tooth morphogenesis we have analyzed the expression patterns of Fgf‐4, ‐8, and ‐9 in the developing mouse molar and incisor tooth germs from initiation to completion of morphogenesis by in situ hybridization analysis. The expression of these Fgfs was confined to dental epithelial cells at stages when epithelial‐mesenchymal signaling regulates critical steps of tooth morphogenesis. Fgf‐8 and Fgf‐9 mRNAs were present in the oral epithelium of the first branchial arch at E10 and 1 day later expression became more restricted to the area of presumptive dental epithelium and persisted there until the start of epithelial budding. Fgf‐8 mRNAs were not detected later in the developing tooth. Fgf‐4 and Fgf‐9 expression was upregulated in the primary enamel knot, which is a putative signaling center regulating tooth shape. Subsequently, Fgf‐4 and Fgf‐9 were expressed in the secondary enamel knots at the sites of tooth cusps. Fgf‐9 expression spread from the primary enamel knot within the inner enamel epithelium where it remained until E18. In the continuously growing incisors Fgf‐9 expression persisted in the epithelium of the cervical loops. The effects of FGFs were analyzed on the expression of the homeobox‐containing transcription factors Msx‐1 and Msx‐2, which are associated with tissue interactions and regulated by the dental epithelium. Locally applied FGF‐4, ‐8, and ‐9 stimulated intensely the expression of Msx‐1 but not Msx‐2 in the isolated dental mesenchyme. We suggest that the three FGFs act as epithelial signals mediating inductive interactions between dental epithelium and mesenchyme during several successive stages of tooth formation. This data suggest roles for FGF‐8 and FGF‐9 during initiation of tooth development, and for FGF‐4 and FGF‐9 during regulation of tooth shape. FGF‐9 may also be involved in differentiation of odontoblasts. The coexpression of Fgfs with other signaling molecules including Shh and several Bmps and their partly similar effects suggest that the FGFs participate in the signaling networks during odontogenesis. Dev. Dyn. 1998;211:256–268. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.