If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -This purpose of this paper is to synthesize and propose the indicators of knowledge management capability (KMC) in different knowledge management (KM) processes to assess KM effectiveness. It also intends to provide useful indicators for those who are interested in the study of KMC to create effective KM, who can utilize the aforementioned indicators as guidelines in the development of empirical definitions by testing them. Design/methodology/approach -This paper is a literature review research, through which indicators of KMC for KM effectiveness are synthesized, utilizing related documents, literature and other research studies and the characteristics of which are evaluated by the KM experts as specified in qualitative research. Findings -The results of the research suggest two main aspects of KMC for KM effectiveness: first, a resource-based perspective, which comprises technology, structure and culture; and second, a knowledge-based perspective, which comprises expertise, learning and information. It is suggested that there are 84 indicators in KMC for KM effectiveness, which can be divided into: 22 indicators on KMC-knowledge acquisition; 21 indicators on KMC-knowledge creation; 19 indicators on KMC-knowledge storage; and 22 indicators on KMC-knowledge application. Originality/value -Apparently the existing research concerning KMC does not reveal clear conclusions nor designate indicators of KMC in both aspects: resource-based perspective and knowledge-based perspective. The consequence is a lack of direction and precision in developing KMC to achieve its effectiveness. This paper therefore provides clear visions on important aspects of KMC whereby the various indicators of their components need to be developed to enrich the concept and further the development of KM. It also provides future researchers with useful means to assess the KM effectiveness in different KM processes.

The authors examine the effect of national culture on the relationship between market orientation and selected managerial antecedents. They develop and test a theoretical framework with samples from Germany, Thailand, and Indonesia. The findings suggest that national culture has an impact on the effects of antecedents in some cases, whereas in other situations, culture-independent relationships emerge.

No abstract

This paper aimed to explore the determinant factors to affect the capability to innovate organization and used method to gather the data on agency of US. Foreign Missions in Thailand. The finding revealed that the survey from employees understood the concept of ISSN 1941-899X 2015 www.macrothink.org/jmr 562 innovation. In the quantitative section involved collecting data from 270 employees by questionnaire. The results showed mean of the factors to affect organizational innovativeness is rather high level, commitment to learning, Customer focus, management support, organizational structure, knowledge sharing, contingency reward. This implies that all factors were important and that organization is moving to innovative organization. Journal of Management Research

<p class="0abstract">Empirical research methods were used to study the Thailand Talent Mobility Programme and critical factors effecting participation in the project; from the perspectives of academic researchers in Science, Technology, and Innovation, in order to strengthen the competitiveness of technological innovation in Thailand. On the basis of questionnaire surveys of 58 universities and 17 research institutes, 613 academic researchers across the country responded the survey. All responses were analyzed through factor analysis and regression analysis methods. We conducted a thorough study of the impact of all factors to successful programme participation. This research study also identifies recommendations and solutions for successful personnel sharing models in Thailand. A mobile web for innovative university assessment system is also introduced as a supporting tool.</p>