Background: Tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and transfusion requirements in cardiac surgery but may increase the risk of coronary graft thrombosis. We previously reported the 30-day results of a trial evaluating tranexamic acid for coronary artery surgery. Here we report the 1-year clinical outcomes.Methods: Using a factorial design, we randomly assigned patients undergoing coronary artery surgery to receive aspirin or placebo and tranexamic acid or placebo. The results of the tranexamic acid comparison are reported here. The primary 1-year outcome was death or severe disability, the latter defined as living with a modified Katz activities of daily living score of less than 8. Secondary outcomes included a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from any cause through to 1 year after surgery. Results:The rate of death or disability at 1 year was 3.8% in the tranexamic acid group and 4.4% in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.13; P ¼ .27), and this did not significantly differ according to aspirin exposure at the time of surgery (interaction P ¼ .073). The composite rate of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death up to 1 year after surgery was 14.3% in the tranexamic acid group and 16.4% in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00; P ¼ .053). Conclusions:In this trial of patients having coronary artery surgery, tranexamic acid did not affect death or severe disability through to 1 year after surgery. Further work should be done to explore possible beneficial effects on late cardiovascular events.

Objective Isolated tricuspid surgery through median sternotomy can be associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Reports of minimally invasive isolated tricuspid valve operations are rare, but the outcomes are encouraging. We present our experience of endoscopic isolated tricuspid valve surgery. Methods In our institution, 452 patients underwent endoscopic minimal access cardiac surgery between August 2008 and December 2018. A total of 90 patients underwent tricuspid valve surgery whether isolated or with other cardiac procedure. We further selected patients who had isolated tricuspid valve surgery ( n = 24). Of these patients, 13 (54%) had more than one previous sternotomy. Results Tricuspid repair was performed in 18 patients (75%) with the remaining 6 (25%) having bioprosthetic tricuspid replacement. Three (12.5%) were performed with a beating heart, the remaining with endoaortic clamping and cardioplegia. There were no conversions to sternotomy. None of the patients had reoperation for bleeding, tamponade, or valve issues. Three patients (12.5%) required blood transfusion, 3 patients (12.5%) required renal dialysis, and 7 patients (29%) had respiratory complications such as chest infection, requiring continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with 2 being re-intubated. One patient (4.1%) died within 30 days from chest sepsis leading to multi-organ failure. Mean hospital stay was 11.1 ± 8.9 days (median of 8). All patients had mild or less regurgitation on follow-up echo at 6 months. Conclusions Isolated tricuspid valve surgery can be performed through an endoscopic minimally access approach, with good results. It appears to provide better results than a sternotomy approach. A high repair rate can be achieved, and the procedure is particularly valuable in redo-surgery with low mortality and morbidity compared to historical sternotomy case series.

Isolated CPB elicited rapid, substantial leucocyte and platelet activation, and xenon had no impact on inhibiting these changes.

No abstract