Objective: To determine and compare the incidence of in-hospital and 30-day hemorrhagic complication and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) as evidence of safety and efficacy using three different anti- thrombotic strategies using Bivalirudin, Heparin plus Eptifibatide (GPI: GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor), and Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) monotherapy in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a tertiary care cardiac hospital. Background: UFH or Heparin plus Eptifibatide or Bivalirudin is the most commonly used antithrombotic regimen to improve peri and post-PCI clinical outcomes in a patient undergoing PCI for ACS. Among them, the most effective and optimal antithrombotic regimen for preventing ischemic complications while limiting bleeding risk in ACS patients undergoing PCI is still far from being clear. Methods: 324 ACS patients ( age >18 years and ≤75 years) who underwent PCI from May 2018 to May 2019 at UCC, BSMMU, Dhaka were consecutively enrolled in the study and were divided into three groups according to antithrombotic. The choice of Anti-thrombotic strategy was at the discretion of the operator(s) and the patient’s affordability. Group-A: 107 patients received Bivalirudin as intravenous (I/V) bolus of 0.75 mg/ kg, followed by an infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/hr up to 4 hours. Group-B: 111 patients received UFH as an I/ V bolus of 70-100 U/kg (targeted ACT: 250-300 s). Group-C: 106 patients were administered UFH plus Eptifibatide as per the standard hospital guidelines. Dual antiplatelet (DAPT) loading as Aspirin 300 mg plus P2Y12 inhibitors ( Clopidogrel 600 mg or Prasugrel 60 mg or Ticagrelor 180 mg) was given in all patients before the procedure. The maintenance dose of DAPT was continued for at least one month and patients were followed telephonically up to 30 days. The outcome measures were in-hospital and 30-day hemorrhagic complication and MACEs [death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis and target-vessel revascularization (TVR)] Results: In-hospital outcome: Patients treated with Bivalirudin as compared with UFH had a significantly lower incidence of QMI lesions (0% vs.6%; p=0.038) and major bleeding (0% vs. 7%; p=0.021). The bleeding rate was also significantly lower in Bivalirudin arm as compared with Heparin plus GPI arm (0% vs. 6%; p=0.038). However, the incidence of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, TVR were no differences among the three groups. 30-day outcome: There was only one NQMI in the bivalirudin group as opposed to 8% in the heparin group (p=0.041). No other adverse effects were found significantly different among the study groups. Conclusion: In this perspective, observational study of ACS patients undergoing PCI in a single-center showed that Bivalirudin monotherapy is safer than other contemporary antithrombotic strategies. In terms of efficacy, Bivalirudin is non inferior to Heparin plus Eptifibatde but superior to UFH monotherapy. University Heart Journal Vol. 17, No. 2, Jul 2021; 91-98
Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) is considered the “most lethal human appendage” as it causes significant mortality and morbidity in chronic rheumatic mitral stenosis patients due to cardiogenic cerebral infract. Presence of LAA dysfunction has been shown to be a strong predictor of thrombus formation and the risk of embolic event, even if no clot is found at the time of initial examination. LAA emptying velocity are measured by trans esophageal echocardiography (TEE) represent as a surrogate marker for left atrial(LA) function .LAA emptying velocities (contraction velocity) < 20cm/s are associated with risk of spontaneous echo contrast(SEC), LAA thrombus, and subsequent cardio embolic events. So early detection of low emptying velocity without SEC or LA thrombus can reduce mortality & morbidity related to cardio embolic stroke and also helps in further management procedure like cardio version etc. So we will compare LAA emptying velocity moderate versus severechronic rheumatic mitral stenosis patients in our population for further attention. Objective: To assess emptying velocity of LAA in patient with moderate versus severe chronic rheumatic mitral stenosis, from a Bangladesh health service perspective. Method: This was a cross sectional study which was conducted in UCC, BSMMU during the period of from February 2019 to September 2019 in Echo lab . Study Procedure: We were enrolled 33 CRHD with MS (moderate to severe) patients who underwent TEE and met inclusion & exclusion criteria. The purpose of the study was explained to each subject & informed written consent was obtained. After getting consent relevant history, physical examination and preprocedural investigation was obtained in predesigned structured data collection sheet. TEE was done with Vivid E9® machine. Pulse wave Doppler was position at the tip of the LAA and then emptying velocity of LAA moderate and severe were compared. Outcome measure: Among 33 patients, 3 patients were excluded due to outlier and inadequate data.. In chronic rheumatic mitral stenosis in moderate versus severe cases average LAA emptying velocities were significantly higher moderate CRHD with MS compare to severe CRHD with MS,(26.57±4.91;31.12±5.04), P=0.018. Conclusion:Appendicular emptying velocity of LAA significantly lower in severe CRHD with MS compare to moderate CRHD with MS and it has temporal relation with MS severity. It can be used as a reliable, simple and sami-invasive tool to early predict severity and prevent complication in CRHD with MS as well as for prophylactic measured taken. University Heart Journal 2022; 18(2): 73-79
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is predicted to be the most common cause of death globally. Early detection of coronary artery disease and adequate management can reduce CAD related morbidity and mortality. Various non-invasive procedures have been developed to diagnose CAD. Stress echocardiography, myocardial perfusion (SPECT) and cardiac MRI are accepted as useful tools for evaluation of inducible myocardial ischaemia in intermediate risk group patient documented by pre test probability. Among them exercise echocardiography is a remarkable physiological, safe, feasible and cost effective. Objective: To see the role of exercise echocardiography to predict CAD. Materials and methods: This cross sectional study was conducted in University Cardiac Center (UCC), BSMMU. This study include the patients who are appointed for exercise tolerance test (ETT). Echocardiographic wall motion study was recorded at rest and after peak exercise and analyzed to diagnosis the regional wall motion abnormality. Specific CAD was confirmed by coronary angiogram. Results: A total of 40 patients were included in the study from the patients who are appointed for ETT. Patients diagnosed as CAD has the mean age of 50.6 ± 9.7 years and majority of the patients were male (72.5%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of exercise echocardiography were 85.5%, 76.9%, 88.5% and 71.4% respectively in predicting coronary artery disease by exercise echocardiography. The predominant risk factors was hypertension (40.0%) followed by diabetes mellitus, smoking, dyslipidaemia and family H/O CAD were significantly associated with the development of CAD in the study subjects. Conclusion: Treadmill exercise stress echocardiography demonstrates high significance for diagnosis of CAD. University Heart Journal Vol. 17, No. 2, Jul 2021; 114-117
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.