Background: Resistance to antiretroviral drugs is a major challenge among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Mutations that arise as a result of this are diverse across the various drugs, drug classes, drug regimens and subtypes. In Uganda, there is a paucity of information on how these mutations differ among the different drug regimens and the predominant HIV-1 subtypes. The purpose of this study was to determine mutation profile differences between first-line drug regimens: TDF/3TC/EFV and AZT/3TC/EFV and HIV-1 subtypes: A and D in Uganda. The study also investigated the potential usage of rilpivirine, doravirine and etravirine in patients who failed treatment on efavirenz. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 182 archived plasma samples obtained from patients who were experiencing virological failure between 2006 and 2017 at five Joint Clinical Research Center (JCRC) sites in Uganda. Sanger sequencing of the Reverse Transcriptase (RT) gene from codons 1-300 was done. Mutation scores were generated using the Stanford University HIV Drug Resistance Database. A Chi-square test was used to determine the association between drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and drug regimens or HIV-1 subtypes. Results: The prevalence of DRMs was 84.6% among patients failing a first-line efavirenz (EFV)-based regimen. The most prevalent Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NRTI) mutations were M184V/I (67.3%), K219/Q/E (22.6%) and K65R (21.1%). While K103N (50.8%) and G190A/S/E/G (29.1%) were the most prevalent Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor (NNTRI) mutations. As expected, discriminatory DRMs such as K65R, L74I, and Y115F were noted in Tenofovir (TDF) containing regimens while the Thymidine Analogue Mutations (TAMs) L210W and T215 mutations were in Zidovudine (AZT)-based regimens. No significant difference (p = 0.336) was found for overall DRMs between HIV-1 subtypes A and D. Among the patients who had resistance to EFV, 37 (23.6%) were susceptible to newer NNRTIs such as Rilpivirine and Etravirine.

IntroductionBy Sept 2018, only 59.3% of all HIV positive children on cART under 5 years were achieving virological suppression compared to 88.4% in the general population in Uganda. CCR5 promoter genotype specifically single nucleotide polymorphisms have been linked to modulate patient virological status. However, the few studies that have studied the association in infants have utilized allele-specific PCR a genotypic method limited to detecting already known SNPs. By using Sanger sequencing, we explored the association taking into account novel mutations. Methods Following ethical approvals, a cross sectional study was conducted using archived buffy coat samples from a pediatric HIV drug resistance study between May 2019 and January 2022 at the Joint Clinical Research Centre in Kampala, Uganda. 100 HIV seropositive infant buffy coat samples were sequenced for CCR5 SNP genotype following nucleic acid extraction, polymerase chain reaction and sanger sequencing. Odds ratios were used to determine the association between CCR5 SNPs and infant HIV plasma loads. Results 10 SNPs were identified with frequencies as follows; 58227G/A (21.8%), 58636A/G (28.7%), 58934T/G (74.7%), 59029G/A (48.3%), 59353T/C (55.2%), 59356C/T (23.0%), 59402G/A (94.2%) 59653C/T (66.7%), 59802A/C (34.5%), and 60024A/G (34.5%). Notably, 58227G/A, 58636A/G, 59802A/C, and 60024A/G are novel SNPs. However, none of these SNPs was significantly associated with infant virological failure but SNPs 59029G/A and 59353T/C showed higher odds of occurring in non-suppressors whereas 59356C/T and 59402G/A appeared to correlate with reduced plasma HIV loads. Infant virological suppression remained at 59% and in agreement with the national data. Conclusion Our study augments previous studies that CCR5 promoter SNPs play a role in modulating patient virological status however, strong conclusions could be drawn from either utilizing in-vitro studies or large epidemiological studies.