Background: In Mexico, breast cancer is the leading cause of death by malignant tumors in women aged 20 and older. The World Health Organization estimates that 69% of deaths caused by breast cancer occur in developing countries. Little is known about the prevalence of breast carcinoma in Mexico and its molecular subclassification.Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included patients who underwent a mastectomy (single, radical or lumpectomy) or a breast tumor biopsy (core-needle or excisional) from January 2002 to December 2018. The primary purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and molecular profile of breast in comprehensive cancer center in Mexico and compare our results with those published in the US. This study was approved by our scientific and bioethical committee. Results:The final analysis included 379 patients. The youngest patient was 23 years old and the oldest patient was 89; the mean age at diagnosis was 54.63 years. Patients of 40 years old or younger accounted for 48 of the cases (12.66%) and those older than 40 accounted for 331 of the cases (87.33%). The molecular subclassification showed luminal A subtype in 139 cases (36.67%), luminal B subtype in 143 cases (37.73%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive carcinomas in 32 cases (8.44%) and triple-negative carcinomas in 65 cases (17.15%). Diabetes mellitus was present in 43 patients (11.34%), hypertension in 78 patients (20.58%), obesity in 82 patients (21.63%) and 66 patients reported being treated with exogenous hormone therapy (17.41%). Conclusions:Breast carcinoma occurs at an earlier age in Mexican women compared to women in the US. Hormone-positive tumors were found to be more prevalent in older patients, while high-grade tumors were more frequently identified in younger patients.

Introduction. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a convenient and accessible tool that reflects the nutritional and immunological conditions of patients with solid tumors. PNI is calculated based on the total lymphocyte count and serum albumin level. There is not an optimal well established cutoff value. Low PNI has been associated with lower overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) in breast cancer patients, however, there is no information regarding this prognostic value in patients from Mexico. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between PNI and survival of breast cancer patients from Mexico. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed medical records of patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer treated at Medica Sur Oncology Center in Mexico City between January 2008 to December 2019. PNI was calculated using the following formula: 10 × serum albumin value (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (mm3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal PNI cutoff value. The primary endpoint was OS. The secondary endpoint was DFS. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v25, the associations between PNI and clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed using Pearson's χ2 test, survival curves were calculated with Kaplan-Meier method, and comparison among groups with log-rank. Proportional Cox model was used to perform multivariate analysis. A p value <0.05 was significant. Results. A total of 110 patients were included in the analysis, and classified into two groups: low and high PNI (ROC curve analysis showed an optimal cutoff value of 32.1). Median follow-up was 65 months. Mean PNI at diagnosis was 39.3 (SD 6.7). All patients had infiltrating ductal carcinoma, 15.5% had metastatic disease, 18.2% had triple negative breast cancer, 23.6% had HER 2 overexpression, and around 51% where positive for hormone receptors. Mean PNI in patients with locally advanced disease was significantly lower than in patients with localized disease, (p= 0.044), no other statistically significant associations were found between mean PNI and clinical characteristics. Median OS was not reached in the high PNI group vs 48.5 months (mo) in the low PNI group, while 5 -year OS rates were 89% and 41%, respectively (p= 0.03). The high PNI group had better DFS than the low PNI group (median DFS 65 mo vs 22.5 mo, 5-year DFS rates 65% vs 45% (p = 0.024). In univariate and multivariate analysis, triple negative histological subtype and low PNI were independent prognostic indicators for poor survival. Conclusion. High PNI in breast cancer patients is associated with superior DFS and OS. PNI is an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. PNI is an accessible prognosis factor that uses only regular laboratory assessment in patients with cancer. Citation Format: Pamela Denisse Soberanis-Piña, Edgar Varela-Santoyo, Andres Mauricio Arroyave-Ramirez, Hector Hugo Buerba-Vieregge, Daniel Motola-Kuba. Association of the prognostic nutritional index and survival of patients with breast cancer in a third-level care hospital in Mexico [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS6-57.

Carcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary tract accounts for <2% of all cancers. Neuroendocrine tumor of the extrahepatic bile duct is very rare, and there are <200 cases reported since 1959. The preoperative diagnosis is infrequent (5.12%). The definite diagnosis relies on postoperative pathology which utilized immunohistochemistry study on many biomarkers to diagnose the histological subtypes of neuroendocrine neoplasms, such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and neuron-specific enolase. When the primary tumor has no metastases, radical removal of the lesion appears as curative treatment. The treatment of the carcinoid syndrome or other functioning syndrome is the first priority. We report a case of a 12-year-old Mexican woman with neuroendocrine tumor of the extrahepatic bile duct (common bile duct neuroendocrine tumor) seen in our hospital. Resection of the common bile duct, cholecystectomy, end to side Roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy, and portal lymphadenectomy was performed. A review of the pertinent literature was performed. Given the rarity of the disease, treatment principles are based mainly on retrospective series and case reports. We present the eighth case in adolescence in the literature.

Myoepithelial carcinoma, also known as malignant myoepithelioma, is considered an extremely rare (0.45–1%) malignant salivary gland neoplasm. Approximately 100 cases have been reported in the English-language literature on myoepithelial carcinoma. The majority of the myoepitheliomas described in the literature have been benign, and the malignant counterpart is considered rare (<1%). Such a tumor may appear de novo or rarely develop from a preexisting pleomorphic adenoma (<20%), and in exceedingly rare cases (<0.5%), it has arisen from a benign myoepithelioma (i.e., plasmacytoid myoepithelioma). To our knowledge, no case of myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland arising in a plasmacytoid myoepithelioma synchronized with melanoma has been reported to date. The treatment of myoepithelial carcinoma has been mainly surgical, including wide excision with free margins, with or without nodal dissection. The roles of chemotherapy and radiotherapy have not yet been established. We report a case of myoepithelial carcinoma of the parotid gland arising in a plasmacytoid myoepithelioma synchronized with melanoma in a 40-year-old woman. In our case, a complete response was achieved with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on carboplatin and paclitaxel concurrent with radiotherapy.

ObjectivesTo compare the rate disparity between outcomes (overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety) of concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) followed by durvalumab in two patient cohorts with locally advanced (LA) stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), one non-Hispanic White (NHW), and the other Latin-American.MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was performed, including 80 Hispanic and 45 NHW LA stage III NSCLC patients treated with cCRT followed by durvalumab. Both cohorts were analyzed in terms of main outcomes (OS, PFS, and safety) and compared between them and with the PACIFIC trial population outcomes. The efficacy-effectiveness gap was assessed using an efficacy-effectiveness (EE) factor that was calculated by dividing each cohort median overall survival by the corresponding reference OS from the PACIFIC trial. In both cohorts, results of PD-L1 testing were recorded, and the main outcomes were compared according to PD-1 expression levels (≥50%, 1–49%, and &lt;1%).ResultsFor the entire population (N=125), the overall response rate (ORR) was 57.6% (N=72), and 18.4% (N=25) achieved stable disease. OS was 26.3 months (95%CI 23.9-28.6), and PFS was 20.5 months (95%CI 18.0-23.0). PFS assessed by ethnicity showed a median for the Hispanic population of 19.4 months (95%CI 16.4-22.5) and 21.2 months (95%CI 17.2-23.3; p=0.76) for the NHW group. OS by race showed a significant difference in favor of the NHW group, with a median OS of 27.7 months (95%CI 24.6-30.9) vs. 20.0 months (95%CI 16.4-23.5) for Hispanics. (P=0.032). Unadjusted 12-month and 24-month OS was 86.6% (95%CI 79.9–88.0) and 46.6% (95%CI 40.2–48.3) for NHW compared to 82.5% (95%CI 77.1–84.2) and 17.5% (95%CI 15.6-24.5) in Hispanics. NHW had an EE factor of 0.78 and Hispanics had 0.58, showing a reduction in survival versus NHW and PACIFIC of 20% and 42%, respectively. HR for the OS among NHWs and Hispanics was 1.53 (95%CI 1.12-1.71; P=0.052) and 2.31 (95%CI 1.76-2.49; P=0.004). Fifty-six patients (44.8%) had some degree of pneumonitis due to cCRT plus durvalumab. There was no difference in the proportion of pneumonitis according to race (P=0.95), and the severity of pneumonitis was not significantly different between Hispanics and NHWs (P=0.41).ConclusionsAmong patients with LA stage III NSCLC, NHW had better survival outcomes when compared to Hispanics, with an OS that seems to favor the NHW population and with an EE factor that shows a shorter survival in Hispanics compared with NHW and with the PACIFIC trial group.