No abstract

Frail older adults in long-term care (LTC) facilities are at high risk for acute confusion. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of four acute confusion instruments for use in LTC: the Clinical Assessment of Confusion-A (CAC-A), the Clinical Assessment of Confusion-B (CAC-B), the NEECHAM Confusion Scale (NEECHAM), and the Visual Analog Scale for Acute Confusion (VASAC). Seventy-four residents from two LTC facilities were evaluated for acute confusion using the four instruments as well as the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM IV) criteria for delirium. Coefficient alphas were .82 for the CAC-A, .86 for the CAC-B, and .80 for the NEECHAM. Interrater reliability on 30 paired evaluations was .90 for the CAC-B, .87 for the NEECHAM, and .80 for the VAS-AC. All instruments were correlated with the MMSE and the DSM IV criteria for delirium at the p < .001 level. Predictive validity was supported for the CAC-B, the NEECHAM, and the VAS-AC. Discriminant validity using the GDS was supported for the VAS-AC. Construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis was supported for the NEECHAM, with a two-factor structure. Based on this study, the VAS-AC is recommended for use as a general screening instrument and when it is positive for acute confusion, the NEECHAM should be used for a more indepth assessment.

Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but deadly cancer. Although there is an emerging picture of the individual MPM experience, the United States is underrepresented in this literature. With the United States contributing more deaths from MPM than any other country, findings from this study will enhance a global body of literature on the lived experience of this devastating cancer. Objective The aims of this descriptive phenomenological research study were to explore the lived experience of MPM in the United States and identify unmet patient needs. Interventions/Methods This was a descriptive phenomenology study employing semi-structured individual interviews with persons with MPM. Results A total of 7 persons with MPM from a large northeastern US medical center participated. Three major themes about the MPM lived experience emerged: (1) uncertainty/worry about the future, (2) value in relationships, and (3) adapting to a new norm. Conclusions Findings from this study are consistent with other MPM research, noting a high symptom burden, lifestyle changes, and feelings of uncertainty about the future. However, participants also expressed feelings of hope and optimism. Particularly salient to the MPM experience was the role of communication with the healthcare team as well as other persons with MPM. Implications for Practice Timely, coordinated, and personalized care as well as skilled communication should be the cornerstone of care for persons with MPM. Supportive care strategies that address uncertainty, the high symptom burden, feelings of isolation, and existential concerns are also integral to quality care.