It was examined whether sexual relationship characteristics were associated with condom use and safe sex practices against HIV. Characteristics investigated were: (1) age difference between sexual partners, (2) previous knowledge of partner, (3) type of relationship, (4) duration, and (5) exclusiveness. Safe sex practices (risky, non-safe, safe) were defined by condom use consistency, previous knowledge of partner and monogamy. Participants (N = 458, were Greek, sexually active and between 18-25 years old) responded to a questionnaire on sexual and condom use practices in their sexual relationships of the past 12 months, condom use negotiation and variables a-e. Only age difference between partners was found to differentiate consistent from inconsistent condom use. Inconsistent condom use was more frequent among partners whose age difference was over two years. Safe sex practices (risky, non-safe, safe) varied across different relationships of 36% and remained consistently non-safe or risky across those of 40%. Risky practices occurred more frequently in relationships where the man was older than the woman. When condoms had not been used, they had not been negotiated in 80% of the cases. These findings reconfirm the importance of negotiation in condom use, call attention to the neglected role of age differences between partners in safe sex and bring forward the issue of studying actual variation of safe sex practices across relationships as an indication of people's response to health campaign messages of risk reduction.

No abstract

The pilot intervention project at Leros PIKPA asylum sought to change the management of residents by decreasing care staff's tendency to view people with learning disabilities with attitudes of custodial segregation (e.g. “they should all live in institutions”) and categorisation (e.g. “they are all alike”). To that end, staff were trained on the job in resident management and participated in seminars, sensitisation groups, clinical case presentations and visits to model rehabilitation units. To investigate whether staff attitudes towards people with learning disabilities had been influenced, staff members responded to a questionnaire of such attitudes, in March 1991 (initial assessment) and a year later (reassessment). Factor analyses of attitude ratings at initial assessment revealed a strong negative attitudinal construct, “Rejective and custodial segregation – Categorisation”, according to which institutionalisation was the only appropriate type of care for people with learning disabilities, regardless of individual differences. At reassessment, however, this factor had split into two independent ones, “Rejective and custodial segregation” and “Categorisation”, suggesting that the staff had understood that custodial care did not apply to all persons with learning disabilities indiscriminately. Reassessment factors further indicated that staff had comprehended the appropriateness of alternative care forms – community and home care. Analysis of Categorisation and Custodial segregation attitude ratings showed that only staff's tendency to view the disabled as “all alike” (Categorisation) had decreased at reassessment. The latter change and the structural change revealed by the factor analyses imply that staff's attitudes underwent a small but significant modification.

A three-year deinstitutionalisation and rehabilitation pilot intervention project was implemented at Leros PIKPA for people with severe learning disabilities. Initial conditions at the asylum were appalling. Residents suffered severe deprivation, extreme institutionalisation, and violation of basic human rights. Intervention involved professionals from different disciplines, and involved residents, their families, care staff, the institution, and the local community. As a result, resident care and adaptive behaviour has started to improve. Communication between residents and families has increased. Owing to training and sensitisation, care staff's poor resident-management practices and negative attitudes toward disabled people have changed. Living and hygienic conditions have been upgraded and building renovation is under way. Asylum administration and the local community have been sensitised to residents' needs. Eleven residents have moved to the project's pilot community home in Athens; two others now live with foster families. The results suggest that deinstitutionalisation and rehabilitation can be successfully initiated even in residential institutions of the severest kind.

No abstract