The
electrical and optical properties of four T-shaped (D)2–A−π–A organic dyes, 3-(5-(1,4-bis(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-6-methyl-6H-indolo[3,2-b]quinoxalin-8-yl)furan-2-yl)-2-cyanoacrylic
acid (1), 3-(5-(1,4-bis(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-6-methyl-6H-indolo[3,2-b]azaquinoxalin-8-yl)furan-2-yl)-2-cyanoacrylic
acid (2), 2-(5-(4,10-bis(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-5-methyl-5H-[1,2,5]thiadiazolo[3,4-b]carbazol-7-yl)furan-2-yl)-2-cyanoacrylic
acid (3), and 3-(5-(4,10-bis(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)-5-methyl-5H-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]carbazol-7-yl)furan-2-yl)-2-cyanoacrylic
acid (4) with triphenylamine as donor, furan as the π
group, cyanoacrylic acid as acceptor, as well as different ancillary
acceptors, are theoretically investigated by multiscale simulations.
On the basis of the isolated dyes, the frontier molecular orbital,
the Fürster resonance energy transfer, and absorption spectra
are studied to explore the effect of different ancillary acceptors.
After that, the dye–TiO2-adsorbed system is considered
by first principle. On the basis of the adsorbed system, the accurate
values of short-circuit current density, open-circuit voltage, and
power conversion efficiency are calculated, which is helpful to distinguish
various dyes. It is always a perplexing problem for previous theoretical
studies. Additionally, the aggregation effect is also considered to
evaluate the performance of the dyes. 6-Methyl-6H-indolo[3,2-b]azaquinoxaline and 5-methyl-5H-[1,2,5]oxadiazolo[3,4-b]carbazole are
testified to be suitable auxiliary acceptors. On comparing the D−π–A
dye with the same donor, the π group, and acceptor, it is established
that the insertion of the ancillary acceptor is important to improve
the overall performance.